Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-25 Thread Alexander Ehlert
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:23:37PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > That sounds useful, but its a seperate issue. I cant think of a way of > generalising it... maybe OPTIONAL? i.e. this plugin will still do > something useful if this port isn't connected. I just might be a bit late giving my 2cents to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-22 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:02:08 -0800, robbins jacob wrote: > However, it seems that plugin writers are more comfortable interpreting > port type=audio to mean that the rate of the port is audio rate. Steve > suggests that it is splitting hairs to try to absolutely determine whether > an audio-

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-21 Thread robbins jacob
To my own surprise I have to object to the suggestion: /* AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to the next audio signal by default. I can't think of any simple examples off hand, but c

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-20 Thread torbenh
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:44:36PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > My main concern abou htis hint is that it artificially introduces a > distinction that isn't really there. Its fine as long as no modular host > ever prevents me form wiring an audio output to hinted continuous control > input or vice-

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-19 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:28:44 -0800, robbins jacob wrote: > To my own surprise I have to object to the suggestion: > /* > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled > by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to > the next audio sign

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-19 Thread Mike Rawes
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:28:44 -0800 "robbins jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To my own surprise I have to object to the suggestion: > /* > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be > controlled by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't > be connected to the

[linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-17 Thread robbins jacob
To my own surprise I have to object to the suggestion: /* AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to the next audio signal by default. I can't think of any simple examples off hand, but comb

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Rawes
--- Jack O'Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + > > > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be > controlled > > > > by a high time res. sl

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:19:38AM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote: > There's a syntactic ambiguity in the name AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Steve > uses it to describe a Controller which runs at Audio Rate (i.e. sample > clock speed). But, Janne understood it to mean a Controller *of* the > Audio Rate, which is

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread janne halttunen
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:35:37 + Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:31:56PM +0200, janne halttunen wrote: > > > No, I dont think so. An audio rate control is just one that has a value > > > per sample, instead of a value per block. Its usful for things like FM >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread janne halttunen
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:58:40 -0500 Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + > >Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled > >> by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:31:56PM +0200, janne halttunen wrote: > > No, I dont think so. An audio rate control is just one that has a value > > per sample, instead of a value per block. Its usful for things like FM > > frequency which can be changed very quickly. Hey, I just thought of a use > > f

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread Jack O'Quin
Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + > > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled > > > by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to > > > th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread Paul Davis
>On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + >Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled >> by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to >> the next audio signal by default. I can't think of any simple

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread janne halttunen
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:58:58 + Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:38:53PM +0200, janne halttunen wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + > > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could b

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:38:53PM +0200, janne halttunen wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled > > by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connecte

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-16 Thread janne halttunen
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:13:35 + Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be controlled > by a high time res. slider or control data, but shouldn't be connected to > the next audio signal by default. I can't think of any simple exampl

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-15 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:48:48 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > > AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Hints than an audio control should/could be > > controlled by a high time res. slider or control data, but > > shouldn't be connected to the next audio signal by default. I can't > > think of any simple examples of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-15 Thread David Olofson
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 19.13, Steve Harris wrote: > There have been a few suggestions recently, I'l try to summarise > them for comment. > > MOMENTARY. A hint to suggest that a control should behave like a > momentary switch, eg. on for as long as the user holds down the > key/mouse button/wh

[linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints

2003-01-15 Thread Steve Harris
There have been a few suggestions recently, I'l try to summarise them for comment. MOMENTARY. A hint to suggest that a control should behave like a momentary switch, eg. on for as long as the user holds down the key/mouse button/whatever. Useful for reset or sync controls for example. Would be use