On Friday 27 August 2004 23.48, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 16:06, David Olofson wrote:
> > On Friday 27 August 2004 21.08, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > Why do we need to /dev/null messages from nonsubscribers
> > > > then?
> > >
> > > because
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 16:06, David Olofson wrote:
> On Friday 27 August 2004 21.08, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Why do we need to /dev/null messages from nonsubscribers then?
> >
> > because its 100% effective unlike the other methods.
> >
> > if they cant be
> Anyway I have already started to code something but it is still at
> very very very early stage and not good for anything. Therefore I
> haven't loaded it up somewhere.
I have created 'project home' for FreeBob (yes, that's the name of it
and there is a reason why :)
http://freebob.sourcefor
On Friday 27 August 2004 21.08, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Why do we need to /dev/null messages from nonsubscribers then?
>
> because its 100% effective unlike the other methods.
>
> if they cant be arsed to subscribe then their messages arent all
> that importan
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> Why do we need to /dev/null messages from nonsubscribers then?
because its 100% effective unlike the other methods.
if they cant be arsed to subscribe then their messages arent all that
important.
-Dan
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 13:51, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 08:15, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > > Messages from non-subscribers are routed to /dev/null because there
> > > isn't a moderator.
> > Is this really necessary in this day and age?
>
> Y
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 08:15, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > Messages from non-subscribers are routed to /dev/null because there
> > isn't a moderator.
> Is this really necessary in this day and age?
Yes, it is.
> The spam problem is solved, it has been for a w
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 08:15, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > > You really should get in contact with the ALSA guys.
> >
> > I have already posted a message there couple of weeks ago.
>
> Messages from non-subscribers are routed to /dev/null because there
> isn't a moderator.
>
Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > You really should get in contact with the ALSA guys.
>
> I have already posted a message there couple of weeks ago.
Messages from non-subscribers are routed to /dev/null because there
isn't a moderator.
Clemens
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 18:30, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce a project which eventually should support
> several Firewire-based breakout-boxes. Following boxes would be
> supported:
>
> - ESI QuataFire 610
> - M-Audio Firewire Audiophile
> - M-Audio Firewire 410
> - M-
Hallo,
Daniel Wagner hat gesagt: // Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Very, very cool!!! You really should get in contact with the ALSA
> > guys. See www.alsa-project.org
>
> I have already posted a message there couple of weeks ago.
Uhm, sorry, I must have missed that and was only looking at the CC of
t
> Very, very cool!!! You really should get in contact with the ALSA
> guys. See www.alsa-project.org
I have already posted a message there couple of weeks ago.
daniel
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Is the intent to produce an ALSA driver, or what?
Yes. My idea was to implement a userland alsa driver (implementing the
alsa lib plugin API). The driver will be based on exising libraries
like libraw1394, libavc1394, etc.
> 2) What is the license of the code going to be
Hallo,
Daniel Wagner hat gesagt: // Daniel Wagner wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce a project which eventually should support
> several Firewire-based breakout-boxes. Following boxes would be
> supported:
Very, very cool!!! You really should get in contact with the ALSA
guys. See www.alsa-project
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:30:08AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce a project which eventually should support
> several Firewire-based breakout-boxes. Following boxes would be
> supported:
>
> - ESI QuataFire 610
> - M-Audio Firewire Audiophile
> - M-Audio Firewir
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce a project which eventually should support
several Firewire-based breakout-boxes. Following boxes would be
supported:
- ESI QuataFire 610
- M-Audio Firewire Audiophile
- M-Audio Firewire 410
- M-Audio Firewire 1814
- Terratec Aureon 7.1 FireWire
- Edirol FA-101
16 matches
Mail list logo
