Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-29 Thread dany
Le Mardi 28 Août 2001 13:54, vous avez écrit : > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, dany wrote: > > I believe the new filetree-standard under linux will help a lot: if I > > know my distro is compliant, if I know the prog I try to install is > > compliant, then I can say there's a bug or not. Elsewhere I'm in d

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread Greg Turpin
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 10:45 am, you wrote: > Alexander Ehlert wrote: > > > >16. Non-programmers that I talked to have never sent a bug report or a > > > >feature request to a software company. The idea of sending one > > > > directly to a programmer or a technical writer was a completely > > >

RE: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI)
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Sladen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, dany wrote: > > > I believe the new filetree-standard under linux will help a > lot: if I know my > > distro is compliant, if I know the prog I try to install is > compliant, then I > > can s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
Alexander Ehlert wrote: > > >16. Non-programmers that I talked to have never sent a bug report or a > > >feature request to a software company. The idea of sending one directly to > > >a programmer or a technical writer was a completely foreign concept. > > I consider this a bad attitude in open

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
Very good point. I could not put my finger on it, but you are right, what often stops you from sending bug reports is that you don't want to be taken for a fool :-). BR /Robert dany wrote: Le Lundi 27 Août 2001 20:59, vous avez écrit :  >16. Non-programmers that I talked to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread Paul Sladen
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, dany wrote: > I believe the new filetree-standard under linux will help a lot: if I know my > distro is compliant, if I know the prog I try to install is compliant, then I > can say there's a bug or not. Elsewhere I'm in doubt. The other alternative is to standardise on De

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread dany
Le Lundi 27 Août 2001 20:59, vous avez écrit : > > >16. Non-programmers that I talked to have never sent a bug report or a > > >feature request to a software company. The idea of sending one directly > > to >a programmer or a technical writer was a completely foreign concept. errh errh in my case

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-27 Thread David A. Bartold
I don't have the original message, but all the points listed are good and apply to programmers too, not just non-programmers. I like software that is easy to use and just works. If it takes several hours to get a linux program working, it is cheaper to just buy the Windows equivalent, which almo

RE: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-27 Thread STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI)
most of the below seems quite reasonable, I just have few comments: > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Conder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > ... > 08. Non-programmers don't want detailed explanations, they want simple > answers. then you can only do simple things... as simple as poss

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-27 Thread Kevin Conder
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Alexander Ehlert wrote: > > >16. Non-programmers that I talked to have never sent a bug report or a > > >feature request to a software company. The idea of sending one directly to > > >a programmer or a technical writer was a completely foreign concept. > > I consider this a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-27 Thread Kevin Conder
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > >From:Kevin Conder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >12. Non-programmers don't want to see information about how a feature was > >implemented. > > In audio processing they will want if they are professionals. > So many things can go wrong if DSP al

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-27 Thread Alexander Ehlert
Hi, > >12. Non-programmers don't want to see information about how a feature was > >implemented. > > In audio processing they will want if they are professionals. > So many things can go wrong if DSP algorithms are incorrectly Definitly, to actually apply DSP you should know what you're doing. T

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-27 Thread Juhana Sadeharju
>From: Kevin Conder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >12. Non-programmers don't want to see information about how a feature was >implemented. In audio processing they will want if they are professionals. So many things can go wrong if DSP algorithms are incorrectly implemented. One needs to look at manuals

Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-24 Thread Mark Constable
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:46, Kevin Conder wrote: > I'm not trying to write a doctoral thesis so my process wasn't > scientific. My information is based on informal conversations with friends > and co-workers. Here is what I learned about how non-programmers use > documentation: Wow, that was

[linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-24 Thread Kevin Conder
I've tried to give back to the Linux community by helping with documentation. I've helped with some FAQs, HOWTOs, and am working on a large reference manual. Lately I started wondering how non-programmers actually use documentation so I asked a few. I'm not trying to write a doct