Do you know if these
patches will make it into
the mainline kernel ?
I don't know what objections there
could be to a conditional_reschedule() ?
regards
Vincent
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:00:53PM +0300, Jussi Laako wrote:
Yes, I have made some lowlatency additions to Matrox and ATI drivers.
At
Vincent Touquet wrote:
Do you know if these
patches will make it into
the mainline kernel ?
I offered those to Andrew Morton months ago.
I think it's up to him to decide, Andrew?
I don't know what objections there
could be to a conditional_reschedule() ?
I have read the DRM driver
I've been running kernel with the DRM patches since January and it has been
rock solid. However my machines are UP only, so if someone happens to be
running kernel with the patches on SMP machine I would like to know if it
works irl.
I've been using them with a Radeon card for about a month
Andrew Morton hat gesagt: // Andrew Morton wrote:
You may be getting bitten by this; dunno. Some xfree drivers
have an option to not use this (mis)feature.
Try adding
Option PciRetry
to the Device section of your XF86Config file.
Should this be:
Option PciRetry on
or
> Running latencytest I have found a quite bad behaviour with the high
> X11 load test when the X server has the DRI module loaded and active.
>
> Is anyone there using DRI and lowlatency-patch at the same time?
>
> Have you experienced this kind of problems?
There are a couple of patches that
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should this be:
Option PciRetry on
or
Option PciRetry off
?
Just a plain
Option PciRetry
without any on or Off.
But another question... That option completely screws my screen and I'm unable to kill
X. Only the sysrq keys
Hi,
Kristian Peters hat gesagt: // Kristian Peters wrote:
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should this be:
Option PciRetry on
or
Option PciRetry off
?
Just a plain
Option PciRetry
without any on or Off.
Maybe it's card dependent. I use the mga-driver
Hi again,
Kristian Peters hat gesagt: // Kristian Peters wrote:
Just a plain
Option PciRetry
without any on or Off.
Please forget my previous mail. No boolean defaults to TRUE:
XF86Config(5x):
Boolean options may optionally have a value specified. When no
value is
Hi!
Running latencytest I have found a quite bad behaviour with the high
X11 load test when the X server has the DRI module loaded and active.
Is anyone there using DRI and lowlatency-patch at the same time?
Have you experienced this kind of problems?
Any known solution? I use OpenGL for
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:40, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
* XFree86 version: 4.1.0.1
** mga driver
* G. Card: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 04)
Is that the matrox driver, or the xfree86 driver? I always use the
(open source, I might add for all you nvidia owners) matrox
Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
...
fragment latency = 2.902494 ms
cpu latency = 2.321995 ms
3.3ms ( 0)|
1MS num_time_samples=21477 num_times_within_1ms=21477 factor=100.00
2MS num_time_samples=21477 num_times_within_2ms=21477 factor=100.00
Or in other words, clean
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:10:56PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:40, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
** mga driver
Is that the matrox driver, or the xfree86 driver? I always use the
(open source, I might add for all you nvidia owners) matrox drivers.
The xfree86
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:42:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
A number of PCI video cards hang onto the PCI bus
for outrageous amounts of time. It gives better
benchmarks in Windows magazines.
You may be getting bitten by this; dunno. Some xfree drivers
have an option to not use this
Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
...
diff -urN linux-2.4.19-pre7/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c
linux-2.4.19-pre7-jl1-ll/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c
--- linux-2.4.19-pre7/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.cWed Aug 8 19:42:15 2001
+++ linux-2.4.19-pre7-jl1-ll/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c Mon Apr 29
14 matches
Mail list logo
