I agree. The more efficient and faster you make the cycle time minimums
in a program, as you are taxing the software with more options and
plugins and the like, each little millisecond counts. And when you cannot
count on the OS to give you low latency in itself, it makes your efforts
futile.
> Which is enough to reconstruct the sine wave if the output is through a proper
> post-DAC filter.
But given a 20Khz sine wave at say 40Khz sample rate, and 90 degree phase
shift (sorry about that) you won't get an accurate level sample of the
signal. Add to this that the clock drift and sine
Going back to the issue of latency, it should be pointed out that while
it might not be a big deal if your softsynth takes 25 ms to trigger,
latency on the PCI bus is a big problem. If you can't get data from
your HD (or RAM) to your soundcard fast enough, you _will_ hear dropouts
in the audi
Actually you are quite wrong about 192 kHz being a hype. Granted if you
are going back down to 44.1 you are not getting much of a benefit. But if
you are say creating music for SACD or DVDA formats, it is
essential. There are three problems caused by lower bit rates; greater
clock jitter disto
And, that 10ms latency is added to the latency of you from the physical
speakers. So you could be 6 feet away in timing instead of 3.
I also bought near field monitors and I don't even use my guitar amp
anymore, the difference of the shorter sound path is very noticable.
Rick
On Thu, 13 Jun
Lamar Owen wrote:
>On Thursday 13 June 2002 09:29 am, Charlieb wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
>>
>>>MAS works over LANs, and should be capable of 10ms latency, which isn't
>>>very low by BTW. You certainly can't play an instrument with 10ms
>>>latency.
>>>
>
>>Nonsense! What
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
> Have a look at MAS, they had an impressive demo at LinuxTag:
> http://mediaapplicationserver.net/
>
> It works with X but doesn't require it IIRC.
>
> That API is not that similar to jack, but hey.
Thanks for mentioning us, Steve!
We're focused on netw
> > MAS works over LANs, and should be capable of 10ms latency, which isn't
> > very low by BTW. You certainly can't play an instrument with 10ms
> > latency.
>
Really? You might want to check my math on this, but if the speed of sound
in air at 75 degrees F is about 1135 feet/second, then it ta
*
Charlie Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"when everything isn't roses, you don't get
any headroom" - Thomas Dolby "New Toy"
*
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11
On 12 Jun 2002, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 21:18, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > I talked to gibson directly about magic. They stated it's patented and
> > they won't give permission for open source implementation.
> I wonder what they have patents on, and whether they're applicable to
> the U
On 12 Jun 2002, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 17:25, Men Muheim wrote:
> > Has anyone ever thought of implementing a library for transfer of audio
> > across networks?
> Indeed I have and it is, in fact, what I plan to be spending most of
> this summer working on. I don't know if you've
Men Muheim wrote:
> Has anyone ever thought of implementing a library for transfer of audio
> across networks? The API could be similar to JACK but would allow
> inter-host communication. This library would simplify the routing of
> audio across networks by solving synchronization issues etc. Ther
12 matches
Mail list logo
