Andrew Burgess wrote:
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 06:55, Steve Harris wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:40:12 -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote:
Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
I dont know, but I think you shouldn'
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:09:26AM -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> > >> >Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
> > >>
> > >> I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
> >
> > >I dont kn
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:09:26AM -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> >> >Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
> >>
> >> I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
>
> >I dont know, but I think you shouldn't :)
>
> Please say why. Thanks!
Well, IIRC
>On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 06:55, Steve Harris wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:40:12 -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> > >Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
>> >
>> > I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
>>
>> I dont know, but I think you sh
>> >Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
>>
>> I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
>I dont know, but I think you shouldn't :)
Please say why. Thanks!
>Zeroconf seems like a good fit however.
>Dave Griffiths wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:43:31 -0600, martin rumori wrote
>>
> > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer
>
>are you?
>
>i'd like to see ;-)
a long-term heads-up: when Ardour gets MIDI sequencing capabilities,
it will includes OSC sequencing, and potentially other "sparse"
byte-
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 06:55, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:40:12 -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> > >Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
> >
> > I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
>
> I dont know, but I think you shouldn't
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 04:46:17PM +0200, Artem Baguinski wrote:
> >Would it be worth adding a bluetooth transport to liblo?
>
> doesn't liblo support something like "custom pluggable transport"?
> that'd be useful for seldom used transports i guess.
No it doesn't, I think thats taking modularit
Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:24:11PM +0200, Artem Baguinski wrote:
it wasn't maintained since around piksel gathering (nov 2003)... oh, and
i'm afraid i have fixed some bugs on artist's offline machine and never
brought the sources back to piksel site. the fixes made it compatib
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:44:28 +0200, David Olofson wrote:
> On Saturday 04 September 2004 00.16, Steve Harris wrote:
> [...]
> > > I *think* bluetooth should be able to handle the bandwith
> > > requirements of a mouse (125 Hz frame rate for the MX models,
> > > IIRC), but 15-20 ms latency spike
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:40:12 -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> >Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
>
> I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
I dont know, but I think you shouldn't :)
Zeroconf seems like a good fit however.
- Steve
>Service discovery just covers being able to locate liblo servers
I wonder if it's possible to use portmap for service discovery?
On Saturday 04 September 2004 00.16, Steve Harris wrote:
[...]
> > I *think* bluetooth should be able to handle the bandwith
> > requirements of a mouse (125 Hz frame rate for the MX models,
> > IIRC), but 15-20 ms latency spikes would be an issue that cannot
> > be fully compensated for regardless
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:32:40 +0200, David Olofson wrote:
> > i never was able to get below a latency nelow 15-20 ms and spikes
> > here and there (if you want run jitter-free i guess you have a
> > latency of 30-50ms or more). i don't know if this is only my setup
> > or if this is normal with
On Thursday 02 September 2004 17.06, smoerk wrote:
> > OSC over bluetooth is interesting. Any comments on it? How easy
> > is the hardware to build? I know you can wire PICs to USB easily,
> > but I dont know much about bluetooth.
> >
> > Would it be worth adding a bluetooth transport to liblo?
>
>
Dave Robillard:
> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 07:48, martin rumori wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:03:18 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
>> > > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to leave the
>> > > mapping open for the
OSC over bluetooth is interesting. Any comments on it? How easy is the
hardware to build? I know you can wire PICs to USB easily, but I dont know
much about bluetooth.
Would it be worth adding a bluetooth transport to liblo?
i never was able to get below a latency nelow 15-20 ms and spikes here
an
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:24:11PM +0200, Artem Baguinski wrote:
> it wasn't maintained since around piksel gathering (nov 2003)... oh, and
> i'm afraid i have fixed some bugs on artist's offline machine and never
> brought the sources back to piksel site. the fixes made it compatible
> with Max
Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:43:31 -0600, martin rumori wrote
> so if I'm writing a osc sequencer
are you?
i'd like to see ;-)
Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:02:43 +0100, Steve Harris wrote
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:48:46PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
BTW, if you have reasonable OSC covereage I'd be very interested in
compatibility tests between whatever you're using and liblo.
Very early days, I've only im
20 matches
Mail list logo
