On Friday 13 December 2002 20.14, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, David Olofson wrote:
> > On Friday 13 December 2002 15.51, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > Re: pull model, an alternative to supporting pull in XAP is to
> > > just say that such plugins should act as hosts.
> >
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, David Olofson wrote:
> On Friday 13 December 2002 15.51, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> [...]
> > Re: pull model, an alternative to supporting pull in XAP is to just
> > say that such plugins should act as hosts.
>
> That's not much better than not having a plugin API at all. To
> sup
On Friday 13 December 2002 15.51, Sami P Perttu wrote:
[...]
> Re: pull model, an alternative to supporting pull in XAP is to just
> say that such plugins should act as hosts.
That's not much better than not having a plugin API at all. To
support direct-from-disk sampling, the host would have to
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, David Olofson wrote:
> Well, who's stopping you from proposing a Sequencer DataBase API, or
> whatever is needed for this? We real time guys will need that as
> well, for sequencing and editing, so it's not like we don't care
> about it; we're just trying to solve *our* most i
On Friday 13 December 2002 10.42, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2002, nick wrote:
> > > > http://amsynthe.sourceforge.net/amp_plugin.h which i am still
> > > > toying
> >
> > My whole idea with it was to make it as simple as possible.
> > Bearing in mind that many people have learned MIDI alread
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:42:39AM +0200, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> Even as a control language MIDI has a lot of shortcomings that it's time
> to get rid of: note pitch values, low precision most everywhere. We might
> as well design a format ourselves. XAP can probably accommodate simple
> "musical"
On 12 Dec 2002, nick wrote:
> > > http://amsynthe.sourceforge.net/amp_plugin.h which i am still toying
> >
> My whole idea with it was to make it as simple as possible. Bearing in
> mind that many people have learned MIDI already, it makes sense to me to
> use it. Another cool thing is that you co
On Thursday 12 December 2002 21.56, nick wrote:
[...]
> My whole idea with it was to make it as simple as possible. Bearing
> in mind that many people have learned MIDI already, it makes sense
> to me to use it. Another cool thing is that you could in theory
> write a sequencer as a plugin for it -
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 11:38, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> > > a softstudio; it's pretty far already and
> > > the first public release is scheduled Q1/2003.
> >
> > for Linux, obviously? ;-)
>
> Yes. Linux, GPL. MONKEY is about 30.000 lines of C++ at the moment. I
> still have to make a final architectu
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 19.32, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > This is *exactly* why I'm proposing the use of a structured text
> > file that matches the structure of the plugin's "exported" names.
> > The *structure* is what you go by; not the actual words. A host
> > would not even have to ask the pl
> This is *exactly* why I'm proposing the use of a structured text file
> that matches the structure of the plugin's "exported" names. The
> *structure* is what you go by; not the actual words. A host would not
> even have to ask the plugin for the english names, but just look up
> the correspo
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 17.02, Sebastien Metrot wrote:
> This doesn't work most of the time because many names can have
> multiple meanings and vice versa.
This is *exactly* why I'm proposing the use of a structured text file
that matches the structure of the plugin's "exported" names. The
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:53:40 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
> That's something we might want to consider. Indeed, building names
> into binaries means we'll actually need one binary for each language
> (uurgh! reminds me of how Windoze "handles" languages...), but I'm
> not sure external files
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 11 December, 2002 16:53
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Synth APIs, pitch control
> On Wednesday 11 December 2002 12.38, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> [...]
> > I shall have to add something like this to MONKEY. Ri
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 12.38, Sami P Perttu wrote:
[...]
> I shall have to add something like this to MONKEY. Right now it
> supports LADSPA via a wrapper - the native API is pretty complex -
> although creating a nice GUI based on just information in a LADSPA
> .so is not possible, mainly d
> > a softstudio; it's pretty far already and
> > the first public release is scheduled Q1/2003.
>
> for Linux, obviously? ;-)
Yes. Linux, GPL. MONKEY is about 30.000 lines of C++ at the moment. I
still have to make a final architecture revision based on some issues
reading this list has evoked, a
16 matches
Mail list logo
