Jussi Laako wrote:
Canvases give you much more than just rendering. They also manage the
graphical objects that you created and, if anything changes, rerendering
the changed parts happens automatically.
That's usually bad and undesirable for any real time graphics rendering,
like audio UIs oft
On Sun, 2006-26-02 at 18:45 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 22:35 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > Interesting fact: there is nothing good about GnomeCanvas.
> > Nothing.
>
> For any free form rendering I use Cairo or OpenGL nowadays. Better
> performance and you get antialiased
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:16:17AM +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 20:38 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
> > Canvases give you much more than just rendering. They also manage the
> > graphical objects that you created and, if anything changes, rerendering
> > the changed parts happ
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 20:38 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
> Canvases give you much more than just rendering. They also manage the
> graphical objects that you created and, if anything changes, rerendering
> the changed parts happens automatically.
That's usually bad and undesirable for any real tim
Jussi Laako wrote:
For any free form rendering I use Cairo or OpenGL nowadays. Better
performance and you get antialiased lines etc practically for free. And
what's most important, you don't have to care about pixel coordinates or
resolutions anymore (esp. in OpenGL).
Canvases give you much mor
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 22:35 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> Interesting fact: there is nothing good about GnomeCanvas.
> Nothing.
For any free form rendering I use Cairo or OpenGL nowadays. Better
performance and you get antialiased lines etc practically for free. And
what's most important, you do
2006/2/26, Robert Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As for other toolkits, there are soon as many as there are stars in the sky,
> though most of them don't get installed on a standard system. I wonder how
> widespread fltk is? I checked it out a very long time ago there was a lot of
> things to like
Robert Jonsson wrote:
>neither Gnome nor KDE are the right choices. The real choices here are QT or
>GTK. The choice is simple for me, QT, but that's just me...
>
>
There's also wxWidgets
http://www.wxwidgets.org/whychoos.htm
Emanuel
On Sunday 26 February 2006 08.11, Jan Depner wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 16:56 +0200, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 13:15 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> > > Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
> >
> > Ah, the sign of a good programmer. :)
> >
> > > KDE
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 16:56 +0200, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 13:15 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> > Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
>
> Ah, the sign of a good programmer. :)
>
> > KDE and Gnome both appear greedy to me. They both want me to use the
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 22:29 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> This is much less true of GNOME than KDE, FWIW.
>
Also before you spout off make sure you've tried a recent version, both
desktops have been de-bloated a lot lately.
Lee
On Sun, 2006-26-02 at 01:17 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
> Yes, having a good canvas widget certainly helps, and Tk has a nice one.
> The one in Gnocl provides a similar interface while it is based on GNOME
> Canvas. (Looks like GNOME Canvas isn't liked very much by some, but I
> found it to be qu
On Sat, 2006-25-02 at 13:15 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> > I'm a programmer = I'm lazy = I don't want to write printing dialogs, or
> > VFS support, especially since it's already provided by gnome.
>
> Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
>
> I think widgets are a GOOD thi
>>for (int i=0;i> cout << i << endl;
>
>
> Shouldn't you put parentheses around on or the other of those
> left shift operators? :-)
What atrociously obscure communication method have you loaded into your
mind? This is C++!
> let rec intersect lst =
> function
> [] -> []
>
Albert Graef wrote:
> /me wrote:
> > To make this thread go totally off-topic, here's the same in Q:
>
> Sorry, I forgot one equation:
>
> intersect Xs [] = [];
> intersect Xs [Y|Ys] = [Y|intersect Xs Ys] if any (=Y) Xs;
> = intersect Xs Ys otherwise;
Ah yeah, like Hask
/me wrote:
To make this thread go totally off-topic, here's the same in Q:
Sorry, I forgot one equation:
intersect Xs [] = [];
intersect Xs [Y|Ys] = [Y|intersect Xs Ys] if any (=Y) Xs;
= intersect Xs Ys otherwise;
--
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, Univers
cdr wrote:
since this thread is so GTK+-centric i'll chime in and say ive found nothing i
like for easily creating customized/flexible GUIs more than Tcl/Tk [...]
Not to forget there's also Gnocl which lets you program Gnome and GTK+
applications in Tcl: http://www.dr-baum.net/gnocl/
I've a
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
for (int i=0;i
Shouldn't you put parentheses around on or the other of those
left shift operators? :-)
Now, << was left-associative, wasn't it? Or was it? ;-)
If you want pristine beauty, you should have a look the function
to find the intersection of two lists in
Carlo Capocasa wrote:
>
> > Ah, the sign of a good programmer. :)
>
> There are actually people who still count, when
>
> for (int i=0;i cout << i << endl;
Shouldn't you put parentheses around on or the other of those
left shift operators? :-)
> is in itself a work of pristine beauty, immen
> > Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
since this thread is so GTK+-centric i'll chime in and say ive found nothing i
like for easily creating customized/flexible GUIs more than Tcl/Tk and
Ruby-on-Rails. both tools allow me to do exactly what i want with minimal fuss
- i
> Ah, the sign of a good programmer. :)
There are actually people who still count, when
for (int i=0;i It's true that with KDE you are marrying into KDE's family with bastard
> cousins like ksycoca, kdeinit, klauncher etc. But this isn't true with
> gnome.
Well I'm not kissing gnomecanvas.
>>T
> Motif is pretty old and full featured, but it's PITA to use, IMO...
Okay, correction. GTK is the oldest full featured toolkit around you can
use without gradually going blind.
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 13:15 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
Ah, the sign of a good programmer. :)
> KDE and Gnome both appear greedy to me. They both want me to use their
> system and hence, tell me how to use my computer. Very little care
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 12:39 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> Personally, I'd love to see more GTK2 apps around.
>
> I think it's the oldest *full featured* toolkit around and I think even
> the bloat is bearable (just keep your hands off anything that says 'Gnome')
Motif is pretty old and full feat
> I'm a programmer = I'm lazy = I don't want to write printing dialogs, or
> VFS support, especially since it's already provided by gnome.
Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
I think widgets are a GOOD thing. I also think modularity is a good thing.
KDE and Gnome both app
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 12:39 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> Personally, I'd love to see more GTK2 apps around.
>
> I think it's the oldest *full featured* toolkit around and I think even
> the bloat is bearable (just keep your hands off anything that says 'Gnome')
/me starts a flamewar
Even the p
Personally, I'd love to see more GTK2 apps around.
I think it's the oldest *full featured* toolkit around and I think even
the bloat is bearable (just keep your hands off anything that says 'Gnome')
Carlo
On 2/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I've always steered clear of writing GUIs, so my experience is pretty
> limited. But now I find myself needing a toolkit/widget set.
>
> What's recommended? I'd prefer not to have to move my app from C to
> C++ just to impl
28 matches
Mail list logo
