>But I don't for a second believe that this mic has any special
>affinity with Digi hardware. This is pure marketing and packaging
>for both companies.
my point precisely. in other words, "drivel" :)
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:23:07PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >The latter. If you read the whole thing, it's pretty clear even from that
> >link that "tailored to fit the needs of the Digidesign end user"
> >means nothing more than "it's a versatile microphone".
>
> more than that, it probably me
>The latter. If you read the whole thing, it's pretty clear even from that
>link that "tailored to fit the needs of the Digidesign end user"
>means nothing more than "it's a versatile microphone".
more than that, it probably means "its not a particularly good
microphone for anything in particular
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:16:52PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Paul Davis wrote:
> >> http://aes.harmony-central.com/115AES/Content/Blue/PR/Bluebird.html
> >
> >hey paul, how about getting neumann to sell their large diaphragms
> >bundled with an ardour live evaluation cd ?
> >beat digidesign wher
>Paul Davis wrote:
>> http://aes.harmony-central.com/115AES/Content/Blue/PR/Bluebird.html
>
>hey paul, how about getting neumann to sell their large diaphragms
>bundled with an ardour live evaluation cd ?
>beat digidesign where it hurts most: in the packaging >;->
i said it was drivel because it
Paul Davis wrote:
http://aes.harmony-central.com/115AES/Content/Blue/PR/Bluebird.html
hey paul, how about getting neumann to sell their large diaphragms
bundled with an ardour live evaluation cd ?
beat digidesign where it hurts most: in the packaging >;->
--
Progress (n.): The process throug
http://aes.harmony-central.com/115AES/Content/Blue/PR/Bluebird.html
