On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:16:04PM -0800, Lance Blisters wrote:
> gdam saves in an xml format. searching the lad
> archive at the time, i couldn't find a final
> specification, but i followed the
> suggestions which were made. appended is
> an xml fragment. the Ladspa-Plugin-Settings
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> This shouldn't be a problem. Ecasound's preset files are not just presets,
> but actually descriptions of whole plugin networks (multi-operator,
> multi-chain w/ controllers). So they aren't very useful to other apps
> (without linking to or duplicati
> Are there other competing formats or is Ardour's preset format the one to
> use? How about other LADSPA hosts; snd, GLAME, gdam, etc - do you support
> LADSPA-presets?
gdam saves in an xml format. searching the lad
archive at the time, i couldn't find a final
specification, but i follow
Oops, a little late response this time...
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
>> PS Reasons for using standard ecasound syntax instead of xml in
>>the preset files are a) consistency (-> man ecasound(1)), and
>>b) to avoid dependency to a xml-parser library (main ecasound
>>
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> PS Reasons for using standard ecasound syntax instead of xml in
>the preset files are a) consistency (-> man ecasound(1)), and
>b) to avoid dependency to a xml-parser library (main ecasound
>only requires libc and libstdc++).
Kai,
I shoul
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Steve Harris wrote:
> Cool. If the "chain" section does what I think it does, then this is a
> truely wonderful program.
Well, if you think what I think you are thinking about, I don't think it
does. :) But for chaining operators, you should use ecasound's presets (=
plugin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:00PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>
> Arrggh, and the same for all hint-fields except rangehints->lowbound and
> rangehints->upperbound. I admit I deserve the "how about testing your code
> even once" comment. :)
I would never say such a thing ;) Anyway, I though it w
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Steve Harris wrote:
> This is really cool. I've allready found some serious bugs in my code. I
> feel churlish about reporting bugs, but I'm going to anyway ;)
After checking 'churlish' from my dictionary, I can assure that your not
churlish at all. :)
> Theres something fu
