On 04 Jun 2002 23:23:35 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would happen in the current implementation? Would it be truncated?
> What I am wondering is if I use sf_read_short () for loading all samples
> regardless of format will it work correctly?
>From memory the problem was rea
On 04 Jun 2002 23:23:35 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would happen in the current implementation? Would it be truncated?
> What I am wondering is if I use sf_read_short () for loading all samples
> regardless of format will it work correctly?
>From memory the problem was rea
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 03:57, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> On 04 Jun 2002 03:09:47 -0600
> Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wow, I was not aware of that. I thought that "sf_read_short" should only
> > be called for 16 bit audio, sf_read_int for 24 bit, etc.
>
> Version 1 (ready RealSo
On 04 Jun 2002 03:09:47 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, I was not aware of that. I thought that "sf_read_short" should only
> be called for 16 bit audio, sf_read_int for 24 bit, etc.
Version 1 (ready RealSoonNow (tm) honest :-)) even does something sensible
when you read say
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 02:45, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
> On 04 Jun 2002 01:04:55 -0600
> Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does libsndfile have sample conversion routines yet? That is the one
> > thing I like about libaudiofile. You can set a virtual format and this
> > would be conv
On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 21:01:14 -0400
Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm a huge fan of libsndfile (its so much better than the SGI inspired
> API that does the same thing).
Thanks for the very positive feedback :-).
> but to be honest, sampler patches aren't in libsndfile's domain.
Tha
