'found' is always 0 at that point, so the test is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Diego Calleja
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
===
--- linux.orig/fs/
Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:12:38PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow.
Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a
r
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:12:38PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>>Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow.
> >>Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a
> >>rebased version in a few minutes.
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow.
Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a
rebased version in a few minutes.
Ok, the rebased version is ready to use.
N
Hi Pádraig,
Pádraig Brady writes:
> How different exactly?
> OK I tried this myself on F11 with inconclusive results.
I can't replicate it now, all tests I am doing report that blocks used
before and after the clone are the same. Probably yesterday the
difference I noticed was in reality the
From: Julia Lawall
find_zlib_workspace returns an ERR_PTR value in an error case instead of NULL.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
@match exists@
expression x, E;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = find_zlib_workspace(...)
Hello everyone,
This pull request is much bigger than I had planned on sending. The
large changes come from patches that Josef Bacik has been refining since
2.6.28 or so, and they include important fixes.
First they change the way we track which extents are free in ram,
significantly reducing sl
2009/7/28 Chris Mason :
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:37:13PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>> Heyho!
>>
>> Just a first impression report from a pure user. I've started to play
>> around with btrfs a bit, without using any btrfs-specific features so far,
>> though.
>
> Hi, thanks for sending thi
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:37:13PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Heyho!
>
> Just a first impression report from a pure user. I've started to play
> around with btrfs a bit, without using any btrfs-specific features so far,
> though.
Hi, thanks for sending this along.
>
> 700G, ca. 1/2 fu
