Re: Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs

2010-09-27 Thread Jan Kara
[Added CCs for similar ecryptfs warning] On Thu 23-09-10 12:38:49, Andrew Morton wrote: This started appearing for me on v2.6.36-rc5-49-gc79bd89; it did not happen on v2.6.36-rc5-33-g1ce1e41, probably because it does not have commit 692ebd17c2905313fff3c504c249c6a0faad16ec which introduces

btrfs user survey?

2010-09-27 Thread Francis Galiegue
Hello list, At this point in time, btrfs has gained a lot of interest, and not only a passing one. So, it is, imho, the ideal time to build up a survey to monitor how btrfs is used today (or _was_ used - I have knowledge of people that started to use it but dropped for various reasons). Of

Re: btrfs user survey?

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Francis, Well, all in all, you get the idea, and I'm probably not the guy to craft questions for such a survey. But having input from as large a panel of users as possible would be a nice thing to have. Your questions are fine -- I might add: * Rank the following future features

Re: Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:25:48AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: [Added CCs for similar ecryptfs warning] On Thu 23-09-10 12:38:49, Andrew Morton wrote: This started appearing for me on v2.6.36-rc5-49-gc79bd89; it did not happen on v2.6.36-rc5-33-g1ce1e41, probably because it does not have

Re: btrfs user survey?

2010-09-27 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:   Well, all in all, you get the idea, and I'm probably not the guy   to craft questions for such a survey. But having input from as   large a panel of users as possible would be a nice thing to have. Your questions are fine

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3017!

2010-09-27 Thread Calvin Walton
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 13:25 +0300, Markus Suvanto wrote: This time kernel is 2.6.36-rc5-00151-g32163f4 no reverted commits no openafs module and hopefully enough debug information There are multiple warning: ---[ end trace a72eccec168b ]--- [ cut here ]

Re: Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs

2010-09-27 Thread Jan Kara
On Mon 27-09-10 18:54:52, Chris Mason wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:25:48AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: [Added CCs for similar ecryptfs warning] On Thu 23-09-10 12:38:49, Andrew Morton wrote: This started appearing for me on v2.6.36-rc5-49-gc79bd89; it did not happen on

Re: Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs

2010-09-27 Thread Cesar Eduardo Barros
Em 27-09-2010 19:25, Jan Kara escreveu: [Added CCs for similar ecryptfs warning] On Thu 23-09-10 12:38:49, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] device fsid 44d595920ddedfa-3ece6b56e80f689e devid 1 transid 22342 /dev/mapper/vg_cesarbinspiro-lv_home SELinux: initialized (dev dm-3, type btrfs), uses xattr