ping?
On 04/19/2011 09:35 AM, liubo wrote:
Filesystem, like Btrfs, has some ULL macros, and when these macros are
passed
to tracepoints'__print_symbolic(), there will be 64-32 truncate WARNINGS
during
compiling on 32bit box.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
Currently on
commit 7cf96da3ec7ca225acf4f284b0e904a1f5f98821
Author: Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com
Date: Mon Apr 25 19:43:53 2011 -0400
Btrfs: cleanup error handling in inode.c
merged into 2.6.38.4
I'm on a btrfs filesystem that has been used for some time. Let's say nine
months.
Excerpts from John Wyzer's message of 2011-04-29 10:46:08 -0400:
Currently on
commit 7cf96da3ec7ca225acf4f284b0e904a1f5f98821
Author: Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com
Date: Mon Apr 25 19:43:53 2011 -0400
Btrfs: cleanup error handling in inode.c
merged into 2.6.38.4
I'm on a
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:12:59AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
This code tests whether the mutex_lock can be acquired, and when the
mutex_lock can be taken, it try again.
So I think that it is not a meaningless code.
Correct, this code is waiting for the current lock holder to finish.
It's
Hi,
I was giving btrfs (2.6.39-rc4) a quick tryout today and noticed some odd
behavior when running a rather stupid test.
First, I create a 1GB test fs, format it, and mount it. Then, I run the
following command to create a huge file, truncate it, rewrite it, and report
what size file got
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:00:16PM -0600, cwillu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Darrick J. Wong djw...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
I was giving btrfs (2.6.39-rc4) a quick tryout today and noticed some odd
behavior when running a rather stupid test.
First, I create a 1GB test fs,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Darrick J. Wong djw...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:00:16PM -0600, cwillu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Darrick J. Wong djw...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
I was giving btrfs (2.6.39-rc4) a quick tryout today and noticed some odd
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:24:16PM -0600, cwillu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Darrick J. Wong djw...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:00:16PM -0600, cwillu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Darrick J. Wong djw...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
I was giving btrfs
Hallo, Darrick,
Du meintest am 29.04.11:
First, I create a 1GB test fs, format it,
in which way? RAID0, RAID1, mix or something else?
Strangely, df reports that free space remains, and I can even create
a second file to fill the empty space, so clearly the fs isn't full
yet.
df tells,
Hi there.
Just a quick question: How do I rename an existing btrfs filesystem
without destroying all the subvolumes on it?
From mkfs.btrfs it says -L sets the initial filesystem label.
With ext2, 3 and 4 the filesystem label can be changed with tune2fs.
Does similar functionality exist in
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Evert Vorster evors...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there.
Just a quick question: How do I rename an existing btrfs filesystem
without destroying all the subvolumes on it?
From mkfs.btrfs it says -L sets the initial filesystem label.
With ext2, 3 and 4 the
11 matches
Mail list logo