On 09/28/2012 10:13 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Summary:
Disk_size: 135.00 GiB
Disk_allocated: 10.51 GiB
Disk_unallocated: 124.49 GiB
Used:2.59 GiB
Free_(Estimated): 91.93 GiB
From: Robin Dong san...@taobao.com
The function btrfs_insert_some_items() would not be called by any other
functions,
so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Dong san...@taobao.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 143 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+),
From: Robin Dong san...@taobao.com
When building btrfs from kernel code, it will report:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.h:281: warning: 'extent_buffer_page' declared inline
after being called
fs/btrfs/extent_io.h:281: warning: previous declaration of
'extent_buffer_page' was here
Hi,
First of all, i've to say that i'm not a linux specialist, so that
means my point of view is balanced between a linux admin and a user.
I may also say stupid things, so pleas excuse me in advance :p
The first difference between the original command and the discussed
one is on the value
Hi Josef,
FYI, kernel build failed on
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git
master
head: 5aeafaaac9c84f3e2297914c748243bb34b0c5c5
commit: 5aeafaaac9c84f3e2297914c748243bb34b0c5c5 [81/82] Btrfs: do not async
metadata csumming in certain situations
config:
Hi Sébastien,
On 09/29/2012 11:59 AM, Sébastien Maury wrote:
Hi,
First of all, i've to say that i'm not a linux specialist, so that means
my point of view is balanced between a linux admin and a user.
I may also say stupid things, so pleas excuse me in advance :p
The first difference between
In srhink_delalloc(), writeback starts if idle, also check the bdi is
not write congested.
The patch is against the head of the btrfs-next.
Signed-off-by: Itaru Kitayama kitay...@cl.bb4u.ne.jp
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:20:09PM +0900, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3712,7 +3712,7 @@ static void shrink_delalloc(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 t
while (delalloc_bytes loops 3) {
max_reclaim =
On Viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 15:51:07 Jan Schmidt escribió:
From: Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt list.bt...@jan-o-sch.net
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
---
This is the rebased version of Arne's qgroup patch set. He's the
original author, which is
Welcome.
I was using this btrfs file system on kernel 3.6 rc4 and rc5 and 3.5.4
on Mint 13 (which is based on Ubuntu 12.04). Now, I found the following
output of btrfsck /dev/sda8 (which was of course off-line at that time):
checking extents
checking fs roots
root 256 inode 581419 errors 100
Resubmit this after the checkpatch test.
In srhink_delalloc(), writeback starts if idle, also check the bdi is
not write congested.
The patch is against the head of the btrfs-next.
Signed-off-by: Itaru Kitayama kitay...@cl.bb4.ne.jp
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
This is the correct one.
Signed-off-by: Itaru Kitayama kitay...@cl.bb4.ne.jp
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index efb044e..c032dbe 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3712,8 +3712,9 @@ static void shrink_delalloc(struct btrfs_root
12 matches
Mail list logo
