From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
This set of patch will make
btrfs su list -s subvol
to list only snapshot(s) of the given subvol.
before:
btrfs su list -s /btrfs/sv1
nothing
btrfs su list -s /btrfs
ID 258 gen 6 cgen 6 top level 5 otime 2012-10-18 17:01:56 uuid
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
btrfs-list.c |6 ++
btrfs-list.h |1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfs-list.c b/btrfs-list.c
index 462e049..369500d 100644
--- a/btrfs-list.c
+++
Hi,
While originally debugging some tree mod log thing, I'm seeing space info
warnings along the way, running cmason/master (f46dbe3de). I just drop them off,
haven't looked into it any deeper than most likely not tree mod log related.
-Jan
6[ 1131.563658] device label quota devid 1 transid 4
Just a small program to print the fields of a super block.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de
---
Makefile | 5 +-
btrfs-show-super.c | 201 +
2 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:23:53 +0800, Anand jain wrote:
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
This set of patch will make
btrfs su list -s subvol
to list only snapshot(s) of the given subvol.
before:
btrfs su list -s /btrfs/sv1
nothing
btrfs su list -s /btrfs
ID 258 gen 6 cgen 6 top
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:33PM +0800, zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
FS_IOC_GET_HEAT_INFO: return a struct containing the various
metrics collected in btrfs_freq_data
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:22PM +0800, zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
NOTE:
The patchset is currently post out mainly to make sure
it is going in the correct direction and
On 19/10/12, Miao Xie (mi...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
On fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:23:53 +0800, Anand jain wrote:
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
This set of patch will make
btrfs su list -s subvol
to list only snapshot(s) of the given subvol.
before:
btrfs su list -s /btrfs/sv1
On fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:23:55 +0800, Anand jain wrote:
From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
btrfs su list -a /btrfs/sv1
ID 256 gen 6 top level 5 path FS_TREE/sv1
ID 258 gen 6 top level 5 path FS_TREE/ss1
I don't agree with this patch, because after applying this patch, the output of
Key MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING means that we're doing memmove inside
an extent buffer node, and the node's number of items remains unchanged
(unless we are inserting a single pointer, but we have MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for
that).
So we don't need to increase node's number of items during
Since we don't use MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING to add nritems
during rewinding, we should insert a MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE operation first.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
'disk_key' is not used at all.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 235831f..7f649d2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -772,8
The argument 'tree_mod_log' is not necessary since all of callers enable it.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index bbea4fb..235831f 100644
Hi liubo,
Patches 3 and 4 are looking good. I'm still trying to sort out on the other two,
as I cannot reproduce your bug with your script, unfortunately.
After applying all 4 patches, the result doesn't compile, here:
fs/btrfs/ctree.c: In function 'balance_level':
fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1799:
On 10/19/2012 08:14 PM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
Hi liubo,
Patches 3 and 4 are looking good. I'm still trying to sort out on the other
two,
as I cannot reproduce your bug with your script, unfortunately.
After applying all 4 patches, the result doesn't compile, here:
fs/btrfs/ctree.c: In
'disk_key' is not used at all.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
v1-v2: update the functions' caller.
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 235831f..a794c6f 100644
---
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
If it isn't the free space cache, it'll be a fragmentation problem. The
easiest way to tell the difference is to get a few sysrq-w snapshots
during the boot.
Hi, Chris,
with some help from openSUSE community, I
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
If it isn't the free space cache, it'll be a fragmentation problem. The
easiest way to tell the difference is to get a few sysrq-w snapshots
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:41 PM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
You need to hit alt-sysrq-w during the slowness you're trying to
instrument; the pastebin is from an hour later.
Also, next time just put the output directly in the email, that way
it's permanently around to look at and search
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:41 PM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
Also, next time just put the output directly in the email, that way
it's permanently around to look at and search for.
Hi,
I did it. here's my dmesg:
[ 25.623660] SysRq : Show Blocked State
[ 25.623667] task
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:41 PM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
Also, next time just put the output directly in the email, that way
it's permanently around to look at and search for.
Hi,
I did it. here's my dmesg:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:55 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
It appears space_cache isn't enabled on your rootfs; can you do a
mount / -o remount,space_cache, sync a couple times, make some
coffee, and then reboot, and see if it's better?
You should see two instances of btrfs: disk space
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:55 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
It appears space_cache isn't enabled on your rootfs; can you do a
mount / -o remount,space_cache, sync a couple times, make some
coffee, and then reboot,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:55 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
It appears space_cache isn't enabled on your rootfs; can you do a
mount / -o remount,space_cache, sync a couple times, make some
coffee, and then reboot, and see if it's better?
You should see two instances of btrfs: disk space
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:26 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
That would work, but it's only necessary to mount with it once (and
it's probably been done already with /home), hence the -o
remount,space_cache
Now my kernel loads in 10s, another 4s for userspace...then -.mount
and all the
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:26 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
That would work, but it's only necessary to mount with it once (and
it's probably been done already with /home), hence the -o
remount,space_cache
Now my
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:35 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
Without space_cache (once), btrfs has to repopulate that information
the slow way every mount; with it, it can just load the data from the
last unmount (modulo some consistency checks).
The setting is sticky, so you don't
The tool can also generate a manifest file. Given the manifest file, it
can determine which files are missing or in excess, and inform about
metadata / data checksum mismatches.
It builds for linux and solaris.
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
---
It can also be found at
Alex reported a problem where we were writing between chunks on a rbd
device. The thing is we do bio_add_page using logical offsets, but the
physical offset may be different. So when we map the bio now check to see
if the bio is still ok with the physical offset, and if it is not split the
bio
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:35 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
Without space_cache (once), btrfs has to repopulate that information
the slow way every mount; with it, it can just load the data from the
last unmount
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Jérôme Poulin jeromepou...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got this weird WARNING in my system log on a freshly created FS,
I'm using ACL with Samba, this is the only difference I could tell
from any other FSes. It is also using Debian's Wheezy kernel which is
quite old.
After updating to 3.5.5, I get thi on boot and listing some dir freezes.
I don't have anything important on that volume but I'm willing to
debug the problem if needed. Would I need a more recent kernel?
[ 128.574596] [ cut here ]
[ 128.574652] kernel BUG at
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jérôme Poulin jeromepou...@gmail.com wrote:
After updating to 3.5.5, I get thi on boot and listing some dir freezes.
I don't have anything important on that volume but I'm willing to
debug the problem if needed. Would I need a more recent kernel?
Probably
On 10/20/2012 05:01 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Alex reported a problem where we were writing between chunks on a rbd
device. The thing is we do bio_add_page using logical offsets, but the
physical offset may be different. So when we map the bio now check to see
if the bio is still ok with the
34 matches
Mail list logo
