On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 07:49:17PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Michael m...@draftx.net wrote:
Subvolid=0 is always the root subvolume.
OK so then what is subvolid=5?
subvolid=5 is the actual ID used internally for the top-level
subvolume. subvolid=0 won't
Hello,
Thank you so much for your prompt response. Few more questions inline.
On 2 December 2012 23:46, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:17:26PM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
I am looking at btrfs to understand some of its features. One of them
is the snapshot
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:24:20PM +0530, nafisa mandliwala wrote:
I needed help with understanding the snapshot comparison algorithm
that snapper uses and its shortcomings. From reading the code, what I
understood is that it does a block by block compare. I'm not very sure
if that's the best
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
I wanted to give a shot at bitcoin so I installed it from the Ubuntu
PPA, and started getting the database from the Internet. (it's now 4.5
GB big on
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 2 December 2012 23:46, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:17:26PM +0100, Aastha Mehta wrote:
I am looking at btrfs to understand some of its features. One of them
is the snapshot feature. Please
REF No: L/200-26937
BATCH No: 2007MJL-01
Your e-mail address have won you 750,000 GBP in Microsoft end of year raffle
draw award 2012, contact this email : (ernestwilson...@zhot.net)with your
name,address,phone number and age.
Regards,
Ernest Wilson.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
Try 3.7. That's had some significant performance improvements. 3.5
is over 6
Le 03/12/2012 13:09, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Try 3.7. That's had some significant performance improvements. 3.5 is
over 6 months old, which is a long time in btrfs development.
I understand the suggestion from a developper's PoV, but from a user's
that's much too much hassle living ahead of one's
Hi Swâmi,
On Mon, December 03, 2012 at 12:54 (+0100), Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
I wanted to give a shot at bitcoin so I installed it from the
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:34:06AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
When creating a btrfs volume with mkfs.btrfs, I'm noticing that the
first 64KB are completely blank. Is this gap expressly intended for
installing a boot manager/loader? e.g. GRUB 2 allows installation of
boot.img + core.img into a
Le 03/12/2012 16:55, Jan Schmidt a écrit :
Use ubuntu (which in the default setup means you're using ecryptfs for
your /home),
I actually do not use ecryptfs here, but OTOH I have BTRFS over LUKS/LVM.
But I've been using pretty *anything over LUKS/LVM for years, and I've
never notice it cause
Hi Swâmi,
On 12/03/2012 04:09 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi folks,
My laptop is a Core i3-2310M with 4 GB RAM, running BTRFS on a 1 TB HD.
I run Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal, kernel 3.5.0-19-generic 64-bit.
Try 3.7. That's had some
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:34:06AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
When creating a btrfs volume with mkfs.btrfs, I'm noticing that the
first 64KB are completely blank. Is this gap expressly intended for
installing a boot manager/loader?
If you want some historical reading check out the 'BTRFS
This is kind of silly, but may be salvageable...
I made a btrfs on top of luks partition and tried it for a couple
days. Then I made another luks partition on another drive then added
and balanced that new drive as btrfs raid1. A lot of time passed and
the balance finished.
Then I
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Travis LaDuke travislad...@gmail.com wrote:
This is kind of silly, but may be salvageable...
I made a btrfs on top of luks partition and tried it for a couple days. Then
I made another luks partition on another drive then added and balanced that
new drive as
On 03/12/12 23:24, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
I understand the suggestion from a developper's PoV, but from a
user's that's much too much hassle living ahead of one's distro's
kernel, or using vanilla ones. Been there, done that. No more
suffering for me please ;-))
I'll have to stick with
Hi,
Any concerns on this patchset? Any chance it can be integrated in time
for 3.8 or too risky for it? The Bugzilla entry contains some test
cases that reproduce the issue fairly easily by unmounting the
filesystem right after creating an empty file... Let me know if there
are any extra fixes or
Hi Chris,
Le 04/12/2012 03:18, Chris Samuel a écrit :
In that case maybe using an experimental filesystem that is under rapid
development might not be a good choice, it might be better to stick to
one of the existing stable filesystems instead.
I already made the move back and forth ext4 -
18 matches
Mail list logo
