Hello,
Yeah you can't mount images, we clear out the chunk tree so nothing works.
Let me know if you run into any problems in the future. Thanks,
That's surprising, I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere.
With any other filesystem I could use an LVM snapshot to save the
original state, but wit
The defrag operation can take very long, we want to have a way how to
cancel it. The code checks for a pending signal at safe points in the
defrag loops and returns EAGAIN. This means a user can press ^C after
running 'btrfs fi defrag', woks for both defrag modes, files and root.
Returning from th
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:06:26AM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:57:20 +0100
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100
> > > Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > >
> > > > My builds are cl
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:48:51PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:51:44 +0100
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 08:57:42PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:19:29 +0100
> > > Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sometimes, when
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:57:20 +0100
Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100
> > Ian Kumlien wrote:
> >
> > > My builds are cluttered with:
> > > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by
> > > def
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:51:44 +0100
Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 08:57:42PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:19:29 +0100
> > Ian Kumlien wrote:
> >
> > > Sometimes, when you least expect it, a static binary is what you need to
> > > rescue your data... O
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:02:06PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> > My builds are cluttered with:
> > :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by
> > default]
> >
> > Which makes it hard to tell if something breaks or not
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 08:57:42PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:19:29 +0100
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> > Sometimes, when you least expect it, a static binary is what you need to
> > rescue your data... Or just get a good enough handle on things to make
> > it work again
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:30:21 +0100
Ian Kumlien wrote:
> My builds are cluttered with:
> :0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by
> default]
>
> Which makes it hard to tell if something breaks or not.
> I don't know about you, but bilding with
> GCC 4.7.2 on gentoo, this is a issu
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:19:29 +0100
Ian Kumlien wrote:
> Sometimes, when you least expect it, a static binary is what you need to
> rescue your data... Or just get a good enough handle on things to make
> it work again ;)
>
> "make static" is a gift to you, dear user with filesystem problems!
Wh
(Sadly) No SSD.
I just upgraded from kernel version 3.7.5 to 3.7.6 (running Arch
Linux) with no change in behavior.
2013/2/9 Marc MERLIN :
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:30:04PM +0100, Florian Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am
>> experi
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:30:04PM +0100, Florian Hofmann wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am
> experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can't qualify the
> circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system
> freezes for some tim
12 matches
Mail list logo
