Re: No space left on device, problem

On Oct 27, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Igor M wrote: > >> I made some more tests. Disk is 3TB, first cca 225GB is copied without >> errors. >> Then errors 'No space left on device' begins. > > Post the full entire dmesg somewhere please. pastebin.c

Error from Trying to Mount Btrfs

I have the attached error from trying to mount btrfs on external hard drive. The F.S. was my primary system, then I dd'd it to an external and reinstalled Fedora. I tried to follow https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Problem_FAQ#Filesystem_can.27t_be_mounted_by_label. I used "# btrfs devi

Re: No space left on device, problem

On Oct 27, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Igor M wrote: > I made some more tests. Disk is 3TB, first cca 225GB is copied without errors. > Then errors 'No space left on device' begins. Post the full entire dmesg somewhere please. pastebin.com is one option. Chris Murphy-- To unsubscribe from this list: s

Re: No space left on device, problem

I made some more tests. Disk is 3TB, first cca 225GB is copied without errors. Then errors 'No space left on device' begins. Now if I use rsync with '--bwlimit' option no error occurs or if I choose 'Retry' in Midnight Commander then continues and after a while another error occurs and again 'Retry

Re: Total fs size does not match with the actual size of the setup

sudo btrfs fi df Data: total=5.62GB, used=4.96GB System: total=32.00MB, used=4.00KB Metadata: total=512.00MB, used=288.70MB -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.or

Re: Total fs size does not match with the actual size of the setup

On 2013/10/27 10:27 PM, Lester B wrote: 2013/10/28 Hugo Mills : On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:09:18AM +0800, Lester B wrote: The btrfs setup only have one device of size 7 GiB but when I run df, the total size shown is 15 GiB. Running btrfs --repair I'd recommend not running btrfs check --rep

Re: Non-intelligent behaviour on device delete with multiple devices?

On 2013/10/27 07:33 PM, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote: Hi Today I tried removing two devices from a multidevice btrfs RAID10 volume using the following command: --- btrfs device delete /dev/sdl /dev/sdk /btrfs --- It first removed device sdl and then sdk. What I did not expect however was that btrf

Re: 3.11 and 3.12rc continual hard lock ups

OK, hard another crash this afternoon - I had "dmesg -n7" set and this time (unusually) I had something in the logs: Oct 27 14:48:15 enterprise kernel: [23752.263442] INFO: task nfsd:1537 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Oct 27 14:48:15 enterprise kernel: [23752.263452] Not tainted 3.12.0-

Re: Total fs size does not match with the actual size of the setup

2013/10/28 Hugo Mills : > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:09:18AM +0800, Lester B wrote: >> The btrfs setup only have one device of size 7 GiB but >> when I run df, the total size shown is 15 GiB. Running >> btrfs --repair > >I'd recommend not running btrfs check --repair unless you really > know wh

Re: Total fs size does not match with the actual size of the setup

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:09:18AM +0800, Lester B wrote: > The btrfs setup only have one device of size 7 GiB but > when I run df, the total size shown is 15 GiB. Running > btrfs --repair I'd recommend not running btrfs check --repair unless you really know what you're doing, or you've checked

Total fs size does not match with the actual size of the setup

The btrfs setup only have one device of size 7 GiB but when I run df, the total size shown is 15 GiB. Running btrfs --repair displays an error "cache and super generation don't match, space cache will be invalidated." How can I correct the total fs size as shown in df? -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: btrfs unable to mount

Ehm, after one, or two days (computer was shut down normally to night), now I am not able to mount that btrfs partition. Nor btrfs-zero-log helps. I am going to reformat it, but uploading btrfs-image for further analyse if anybody wants. PS: I have used for this btrfs partition a bcache partitio

Non-intelligent behaviour on device delete with multiple devices?

Hi Today I tried removing two devices from a multidevice btrfs RAID10 volume using the following command: --- btrfs device delete /dev/sdl /dev/sdk /btrfs --- It first removed device sdl and then sdk. What I did not expect however was that btrfs didn't remove sdk from the available drives when re

Re: No space left on device, problem

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Brendan Hide wrote: > On 2013/10/27 10:50 AM, Igor M wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski >> wrote: Still no messages. Parameter seems to be active as /sys/module/printk/parameters/ignore_loglevel is Y, but there are no >

Re: 3.11 and 3.12rc continual hard lock ups

Hi Chris, I set dmesg -n7 and didn't see anything extra logged (I had to use sudo to enable it. I am not familiar with sysrq-w and sysrq-t, however you ask "while it is locked", this is a "real" hard lock. everything is unresponsive and the machine even fails to respond to ping request. It happe

Re: No space left on device, problem

On 2013/10/27 10:50 AM, Igor M wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Still no messages. Parameter seems to be active as /sys/module/printk/parameters/ignore_loglevel is Y, but there are no messages in log files or dmesg. Maybe I need to turn on some kernel debugging

Re: No space left on device, problem

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> Still no messages. Parameter seems to be active as >> /sys/module/printk/parameters/ignore_loglevel is Y, but there are no >> messages in log files or dmesg. Maybe I need to turn on some kernel >> debugging option and recompile kernel ?