On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:57:35PM -0400, nick wrote:
Hello Btfs Developers,
I am new so am unsure of how to fix this but we are hitting some sparse
warnings about unlock/lock is having
a wrong count when exiting certain functions in extent-tree.c. I will paste
the warnings below for you
I forgot the attachment. Here it is.
# btrfs-debug-tree -b 13415158087680 /dev/sdh
leaf 13415158087680 items 90 free space 8577 generation 140065 owner 5007
fs uuid 20ccaf09-54ea-486e-9495-9dc91b933e9c
chunk uuid f5a0dea1-b250-4ea4-bf7f-50d30401a708
item 0 key (7516 DIR_INDEX 102) itemoff
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 10:25 +0800, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When runing restore under lzo compression, bad compress length
problems are encountered.
It is because there is a page align problem with the @decompress_lzo,
as follows:
|--| ||-| |--|...|--|
When runing restore under lzo compression, bad compress length
problems are encountered.
It is because there is a page align problem with the @decompress_lzo,
as follows:
|--| ||-| |--|...|--|
page ^page page
On 23/09/14 07:42, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This patch allocates the appropriate amount of memory
using a char array using the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:41:04PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
If submit_extent_page() fails in write_one_eb(), we end up with the current
page not marked dirty anymore, unlocked and marked for writeback. But we never
end up calling end_page_writeback() against the page, which will make calls
On 2014-09-22 16:51, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 20.09.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Duncan:
What I do as part of my regular backup regime, is every few kernel cycles
I wipe the (first level) backup and do a fresh mkfs.btrfs, activating new
optional features as I believe appropriate. Then I boot
Hi all,
we're testing BTRFS on our Debian server. After a lot of operations
simulating a RAID1 failure, every time I mount my BTRFS RAID1 volume
the kernel logs these messages:
[73894.436173] BTRFS: bdev /dev/etherd/e30.20 errs: wr 33036, rd 0, flush 0,
corrupt 2806, gen 0
[73894.436181]
On 09/23/2014 01:40 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[BUG]
Originally when mount btrfs with -o subvol= mount option, btrfs will
lose all security lable.
And if the btrfs fs is mounted somewhere else, due to the lost of
security lable, SELinux will refuse to mount since the same super block
is being
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:45:34 +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
Regression test for btrfs where removing the flag FS_COMPR_FL
(chattr -c) from an inode wouldn't clear its compression property.
This was fixed in the following linux kernel patch:
Btrfs: add missing compression property remove in
Let's say we have a snapshot called snapshot on our device /dev/sdb.
Now we boot a qemu machine and attatch the disk read only (since we do not
want to put our data at risk in the vm, and read only should be enough to
get our snapshot data).
I used
qemu-system-x86_64 -drive
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:41:04PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
If submit_extent_page() fails in write_one_eb(), we end up with the current
page not marked dirty anymore, unlocked and marked for writeback. But we
never
end
Am 23.09.2014 um 14:08 schrieb Austin S Hemmelgarn:
On 2014-09-22 16:51, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Is re-creating btrfs-filesystems *recommended* in any way?
Does that actually make a difference in the fs-structure?
I would recommend it, there are some newer features that you can only
set
On 2014-09-23 09:06, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 23.09.2014 um 14:08 schrieb Austin S Hemmelgarn:
On 2014-09-22 16:51, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Is re-creating btrfs-filesystems *recommended* in any way?
Does that actually make a difference in the fs-structure?
I would recommend it,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:03:07PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:41:04PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
If submit_extent_page() fails in write_one_eb(), we end up with the current
page not
Am 23.09.2014 um 15:38 schrieb Austin S Hemmelgarn:
On 2014-09-23 09:06, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
What features for example?
Well, running 'mkfs.btrfs -O list-all' with 3.16 btrfs-progs gives the
following list of features:
mixed-bg- mixed data and metadata block groups
extref
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:57:35PM -0400, nick wrote:
Hello Btfs Developers,
I am new so am unsure of how to fix this but we are hitting some sparse
warnings about unlock/lock is having
a wrong count when exiting certain functions
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
While we have a transaction ongoing, the VM might decide at any time
to call btree_inode-i_mapping-a_ops-writepages(), which will start
writeback of dirty pages belonging to btree nodes/leafs. This call
might return an error or the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:01:41PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:45:44PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:57:35PM -0400, nick wrote:
Hello Btfs Developers,
I am new so am unsure of how to fix this but we are hitting some sparse
warnings about
This is actually inspired by Filipe's patch. When write_one_eb() fails on
submit_extent_page(), it'll give up writing this eb and mark it with
EXTENT_BUFFER_IOERR. So if it's not the last page that encounter the failure,
there are some left pages which remain DIRTY, and if a later COW on this eb
If it is unknown, which of these options have been used at btrfs
creation time - is it possible to check the state of these options
afterwards on a mounted or unmounted filesystem?
2014-09-23 15:38 GMT+02:00 Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com:
Well, running 'mkfs.btrfs -O list-all' with
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
While we have a transaction ongoing, the VM might decide at any time
to call btree_inode-i_mapping-a_ops-writepages(), which will start
writeback of dirty pages
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
This is actually inspired by Filipe's patch. When write_one_eb() fails on
submit_extent_page(), it'll give up writing this eb and mark it with
EXTENT_BUFFER_IOERR. So if it's not the last page that encounter the failure,
On 2014-09-23 10:23, Tobias Holst wrote:
If it is unknown, which of these options have been used at btrfs
creation time - is it possible to check the state of these options
afterwards on a mounted or unmounted filesystem?
2014-09-23 15:38 GMT+02:00 Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:00:40PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Here are the patches.
thanks, I've put them into the queue (branch with other fsck fixes).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
This is a starting point for a debugfs style python interface using
the search ioctl. For now it can only do one thing, which is to
print out all the extents in a file and calculate the compression ratio.
Over time it will grow more features, especially for the kinds of things
we might run
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
This is a starting point for a debugfs style python interface using
the search ioctl. For now it can only do one thing, which is to
print out all the extents in a file and calculate the compression ratio.
Over time it will
Damn you gmail...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
all 5 patches will be in the next integration. I haven't tested them
yet, seems it's a bit more important to make a more stable devel base
for more updates you might want to send.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On 9/23/14 7:49 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On 09/23/2014 01:40 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[BUG]
Originally when mount btrfs with -o subvol= mount option, btrfs will
lose all security lable.
And if the btrfs fs is mounted somewhere else, due to the lost of
security lable, SELinux will refuse to mount
While we have a transaction ongoing, the VM might decide at any time
to call btree_inode-i_mapping-a_ops-writepages(), which will start
writeback of dirty pages belonging to btree nodes/leafs. This call
might return an error or the writeback might finish with an error
before we attempt to commit
While we have a transaction ongoing, the VM might decide at any time
to call btree_inode-i_mapping-a_ops-writepages(), which will start
writeback of dirty pages belonging to btree nodes/leafs. This call
might return an error or the writeback might finish with an error
before we attempt to commit
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Make btrfs handle security mount options
internally to avoid losing security label.
From: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date:
Original Message
Subject: Re: general thoughts and questions + general and RAID5/6 stability?
From: Tobias Holst to...@tobby.eu
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2014年09月23日 22:24
If it is unknown, which of these options have been used at btrfs
creation time - is it
Hello Guys,
I am wondering if anybody here would like to mentor me in the btrfs code base
in if they have
any free time. I am not asking for much just someone to answer my questions and
help me learn
the code base well enough to help out.
Thanks for Any Help,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this
Add human readable incompat flags output for btrfs-show-super,
now no longer needs to calculate the hex flags by hand.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
btrfs-show-super.c | 53 +
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git
On 9/23/14 7:31 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Make btrfs handle security mount options
internally to avoid losing security label.
From: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Make btrfs handle security mount options
internally to avoid losing security label.
From: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com, Chris Mason c...@fb.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date:
While we have a transaction ongoing, the VM might decide at any time
to call btree_inode-i_mapping-a_ops-writepages(), which will start
writeback of dirty pages belonging to btree nodes/leafs. This call
might return an error or the writeback might finish with an error
before we attempt to commit
Add human readable incompat flags output for btrfs-show-super,
now no longer needs to calculate the hex flags by hand.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
changelog:
v2: Add the mising 0x before hex unknown incompat flags
---
btrfs-show-super.c | 53
40 matches
Mail list logo
