Hey Qu.
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 10:04 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> If any of you can recompile btrfs-progs and use gdb to debug it,
> would
> anyone please to investigate where did the wrong_chunk_type is set?
> It is in the function check_extent_type():
Not 100% what you want... AFAIU, you just wan
Brenton Chapin posted on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:32:12 -0600 as excerpted:
> Thanks, snapshots, or subvolumes, was it. (I'm not clear on the
> distinction between a snapshot and a subvolume.)
As Hugo says much more briefly, snapshots are a special kind of
subvolume. These are normally (copy-on-wri
Hi Lukas, Laurent and Christoph,
If any of you can recompile btrfs-progs and use gdb to debug it, would
anyone please to investigate where did the wrong_chunk_type is set?
It is in the function check_extent_type():
--
/* Check if the type of extent matches with its chunk */
static void che
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:32:12PM -0600, Brenton Chapin wrote:
> Thanks, snapshots, or subvolumes, was it. (I'm not clear on the
> distinction between a snapshot and a subvolume.)
A snapshot is just a subvolume that's initialised (via CoW copies)
with the contents of some other subvolume, rat
Thanks, snapshots, or subvolumes, was it. (I'm not clear on the
distinction between a snapshot and a subvolume.) The 8G amount and
that I did 2 distribution upgrades was a clue. When I searched for
info on btrfs and snapshots, I eventually found this command, with
these results:
btrfs subvolume
> Shouldn't these be Invalid argument just like the
> to a device case above or the clone case?
E.g. something like this on top of your patch:
diff --git a/tests/generic/158.out b/tests/generic/158.out
index 1210429..dff3692 100644
--- a/tests/generic/158.out
+++ b/tests/generic/158.out
@@ -16,9
> --- a/tests/generic/158.out
> +++ b/tests/generic/158.out
> Try to dedupe a device
> -XFS_IOC_FILE_EXTENT_SAME: Permission denied
> +XFS_IOC_FILE_EXTENT_SAME: Invalid argument
> Try to dedupe to a dir
> -/mnt/test-158/dir1: Is a directory
> +TEST_DIR/test-158/dir1: Is a directory
> Try to dedu
On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, Duncan wrote as excerpted:
> Lukas Pirl posted on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 13:37:37 +1300 as excerpted:
>
>> > Can "btrfs_recover_relocation" prevented from being run? I would not
>> > mind losing a few recent writes (what was a balance) but instead going
>> > rw again, so I can re
Den 2015-11-21 kl. 08:16, skrev Duncan:
> Lukas Pirl posted on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 13:37:37 +1300 as excerpted:
>
>> Can "btrfs_recover_relocation" prevented from being run? I would not
>> mind losing a few recent writes (what was a balance) but instead going
>> rw again, so I can restart a balance
