On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:30:18PM +0100, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> Currently fsstress does not exercise creating, reading or deleting xattrs
> on files or directories. This change adds support for setting xattrs on
> files and directories, using only the xattr user nam
From: Filipe Manana
The previous patch added support for an operation to set xattrs on regular
files and directories, this patch just adds one operation to read (get)
them.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
---
V2: Use a different name for the operation (getfattr) and make use of the
helper fun
From: Filipe Manana
Currently fsstress does not exercise creating, reading or deleting xattrs
on files or directories. This change adds support for setting xattrs on
files and directories, using only the xattr user namespace (the other
namespaces are not general purpose and are used for security,
From: Filipe Manana
Currently fssum, mostly used for btrfs test cases that test the btrfs send
feature, ignores completely the existence of xattrs. This change teaches
fssum to find xattrs and make them contribute to the checksum of a
filesystem, so that we can catch filesystem bugs regarding mis
From: Filipe Manana
The previous patches added support for operations to set and get xattrs on
regular files and directories, this patch just adds one operation to delete
xattrs on files and directories.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
---
V2: Use a different name for the operation (delfattr) and
From: Filipe Manana
The previous patches added support for operations to set, get and delete
xattrs on regular files and directories, this patch just adds an operation
to list the xattrs of a file/directory.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
---
V2: New patch in the series, the first version of the
From: Filipe Manana
Currently the fsync function can only be performed against regular files.
Allow it to operate on directories too, to increase test coverage and
allow for chances of finding bugs in a filesystem's implementation of
fsync against directories.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
---
From: Filipe Manana
Currently the afsync function can only be performed against regular files.
Allow it to operate on directories too, to increase test coverage and
allow for chances of finding bugs in a filesystem's implementation of
fsync against directories.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
---