2011/3/10 Chris Mason
>
> Which kernel were you on? Was btrfs directly accessing the disks or
> were things like LVM in use?
> Recent kernels (.37 and higher) have improved support for barriers in
> LVM and friends, but btrfs directly using the disks should have been
> safe for a long time.
Now
2011/3/7 Spelic
>
> On 03/05/2011 12:59 AM, Alexey A Nikitin wrote:
> > Hi, everybody
> >
> > I have BTRFS RAID0 setup with two disks. After some incident where I
> > had to force shutdown machine this array won't mount anymore
>
>
> Have you "rese
2011/3/5 Helmut Hullen :
> I had to learn that btrfs is still in experimental status.
Oh, I was perfectly aware of it's experimental status when I was
transferring to btrfs all my home systems, that's why I'm not even
thinking about moving to btrfs my servers. I moved to btrfs because
all other fs
2011/3/4 cwillu :
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Alexey A Nikitin wrote:
>> all I get is
>>
>> btrfs-select-super: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion
>> `!(!tree_root->node)' failed
>
> Make sure you run it as root, and try both -s 1 and -s 2.
&
message was created with 100% recycled electrons
2011/3/4 cwillu :
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Alexey A Nikitin wrote:
>> I have BTRFS RAID0 setup with two disks. After some incident where I
>> had to force shutdown machine this array won't mount anymore, even
>>
Hi, everybody
I have BTRFS RAID0 setup with two disks. After some incident where I
had to force shutdown machine this array won't mount anymore, even
after "btrfs device scan". Unfortunately, I don't have backups since I
can't afford another 4TB of storage. I've read that fsck tool for
BTRFS that
