Hi,
Kernel 4.19.59.
% btrfs fi us /backups/
Overall:
Device size: 4.00TiB
Device allocated: 3.44TiB
* Device unallocated: 572.95GiB*
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 3.43TiB
* Free (estimated): 576.36GiB (min: 576
I've just hit this on a backup server. I suspect something would have
been trying to remove/create a snapshot at the time.
I'll ignorantly assume it's similar to the last one I posted (
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg82636.html ) although the
trace is different.
David.
--
While trying to run/use bedup ( https://github.com/g2p/bedup ) I
hit this :
[Thu Oct 4 15:34:51 2018] [ cut here ]
[Thu Oct 4 15:34:51 2018] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
[Thu Oct 4 15:34:51 2018] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28832 at
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3671 clon
I've just spotted this on one server.
Running : umount /backups && mount /backups
seems to allow it to become r/w again, but it does write :
BTRFS error (device xvdj): cleaner transaction attach returned -30
to 'dmesg'.
David.
[ cut here ]
BTRFS: Transaction aborted
On 21/04/2018 10:18, Martin Svec wrote:
Hi David,
this looks like the bug that I already reported two times:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg54394.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg75104.html
The second thread contains Nikolay's debug patch that can confirm if you
Hi
My volume ran out of space, and that seems to have triggered csum errors.
Kernel 4.9.83
% btrfs fi us /backup/
Overall:
Device size: 4.12TiB
Device allocated: 4.12TiB
Device unallocated: 2.00MiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used:
Hi,
I'm running a 3TiB EBS based (2+1TiB devices) volume in EC2 which
contains about 500 read-only snapshots.
btrfs-progs v4.7.3
There are two dmesg trace things below. The first one from a 4.9.77 kernel -
[ cut here ]
BTRFS: error (device xvdg) in btrfs_run_delayed_r
That shell is still hung in the kernel, on a "disk sleep" fifteen
minutes later, and one of my CPU cores is pegged at 100%,
and the disk activity light is not coming on at all.
..
This is not disk bound activity ... it's kernel code bound.
That's insane ... and sad.
'perf top' is my f
kernel 4.1.15
balancing a fs led to this oops.
after a reboot, the balance resumed without problem.
presumably there wasn't enough real memory available
David
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 16560 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260
__btrfs_abort_transaction+0x4b/0x120 [btrfs
Using btrfs progs 4.3.1 on a Vanilla kernel.org 4.1.15 kernel.
time btrfs device delete /dev/xvdh /backups
real13936m56.796s
user0m0.000s
sys 1351m48.280s
(which is about 9 days).
Where :
/dev/xvdh was 120gb in size.
/backups is a single / "raid 0" volume that now looks like :
Hi,
Trying to run a balance on a filesystem results in the below dmesg output.
Kernel is 4.1.13 from kernel.org.
System is running in AWS (hence the Xen stuff).
INFO: task btrfs:28938 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Not tainted 4.1.13-dg1 #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeo
Hi,
See below for oops messages from a 4.1.12 kernel.
The system would probably have been running a balance or scrub at the time.
Processes trying to use subvolumes blocked and it eventually needed
rebooting via sysrq to fix.
Kernel is a vanilla one from kernel.org.
thanks,
David.
INFO:
On 30/10/2015 16:25, Alex Adriaanse wrote:
I have an EC2 instance on AWS that tends to freeze several times per
week. When it freezes it stops responding to network traffic, disk
I/O stops, and CPU goes to 100%. The system comes back fine after a
reboot. I was finally able to get a kernel backtr
Filesystem was being balanced with :
btrfs balance start -dusage=55 -musage=55 $filesystem
when this happened :
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 31502 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2025
__btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.51+0x210/0x280 [btrfs]()
BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error
0x107/0x110
RSP
---[ end trace fcc878a87658ea75 ]---
--
David Goodwin
http://codepoets.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 17/04/15 10:20, WangMike wrote:
Dear all,
We know that one cannot mount multiple btrfs file systems which contain the
same UUID (for example, snapshot ).
Is it possible to make use of "mount namespace" achieve that? means, if the
btrfs file system in different namespace can contain the sam
16 matches
Mail list logo