On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:01, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:37:17AM -0800, Josh Berry wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:46, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> > Btrfs only allocates chunks as we need them, however we do not delete
>> > chunks as
>>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:46, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Btrfs only allocates chunks as we need them, however we do not delete chunks
> as
> we stop using them. This patch adds this capability. Whenever we clear the
> last bit of used space in a block group we try and mark it read only, and then
> w
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:32, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 November, 2010, Josh Berry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a cron script that runs periodically, taking new snapshots and
>> cleaning up old ones when space gets low on my filesystem. This
>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:10, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Josh Berry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a cron script that runs periodically, taking new snapshots and
>> cleaning up old ones when space gets low on my filesystem. This
>
Hi,
I have a cron script that runs periodically, taking new snapshots and
cleaning up old ones when space gets low on my filesystem. This
morning, the script suddenly stopped being able to remove snapshots.
When I tried to remove one manually, I got the following:
# btrfs subvol del 2010-11-07-0
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 15:37, Chris Ball wrote:
...
> > Why not just do:
> > # btrfs subvolume delete /path/to/subvolume1
> > # btrfs subvolume delete /path/to/subvolume2
> > # sync
>
> Or even better, "btrfs filesystem sync ".
>
> I'm assuming that the caller wants to wait until the subv
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 14:52, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Or make --sync the default behavior. This is probably what most
> > people are expecting anyway (similar to how standard filesystem
> > commands like "rm" work). Add an --aysnc option for those that
> > only care about knowing
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 14:07, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > adding a --wait or --sync switch to the delete command is
> > certainly possible, you'd want to add it to the last in a series
> > of deletes.
>
> I think this (--sync) is a much better idea than the alternatives so far.
Or make -
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:10, David Nicol wrote:
> Does the manpatch below describe an acceptable API for a hook to a
> facility for waiting for the completion of deleted snapshot cleanup?
...
> +\fBfilesystem GC\fR\fI [ms] \fR
> +wait for completion of salvage of deleted subvolumes on
> +the fi
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:00, Andreas Philipp
wrote:
> On 20.08.2010 20:49, Josh Berry wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34, Andreas Philipp
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.08.2010 20:27, Josh Berry wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34, Andreas Philipp
wrote:
> On 20.08.2010 20:27, Josh Berry wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:03, Goffredo Baroncelli
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 19 August, 2010, James Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thi
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:03, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 August, 2010, James Smith wrote:
>> This patch randomizes the error codes and also fixes up some typos
> including
>> capitalization in the output.
>>
>> It would almost be nice to see a translation effort for the tool as
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 17:06, Morten P.D.
Stevens wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> thanks for the chart.
>
> Here are the results visually for all:
>
> http://www2.win-professional.com/images2/btrfs01.png
>
> http://www2.win-professional.com/images2/btrfs02.png
What are the units? Are those measuring throu
13 matches
Mail list logo
