the btrfs-progs headers and the
kernel headers.
Signed-off-by: Marios Titas red...@gmx.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 31 ---
include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 31 +++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs
I was experimenting with the BTRFS_IOC_LOGICAL_INO
BTRFS_IOC_INO_PATHS ioctls and noticed that there are some limits in
the kernel that limit the number or results they return. For example,
for BTRFS_IOC_LOGICAL_INO, the structure that will hold the results
can be up to 65536 bytes. Are there any
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
- check whether two files share the same data on disk, i.e. one has been
created by cp --reflink of the other?
How about inspecting the output of filefrag -v $filename?
For example, you could filter out with grep all lines
a file with the noCow flag to a directory without the
noCow flag, the file is now without the flag, but after remount,
we'll find the file's noCow flag comes back.
This is because we missed a proper inode update after inheriting
parent directory's flags,
Reported-by: Marios Titas redneb8
16:40:35 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:32:50AM -0500, Marios Titas wrote:
Sorry, but the bug persists even with the above patch.
touch test
chattr +C test
lsattr test
mv test test2
lsattr test2
In the above scenario test2 will not have the C flag.
What do you expect
Try this:
touch test
chattr +C test
lsattr test
mv test test2
lsattr test2
The original file (test) will have the C flag but when renamed the
flag disappears. If the volume is unmounted and then mounted again the
flag reappears. However, if the file is modified in any way
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:34 PM, David Arendt ad...@prnet.org wrote:
Hi,
I am using kernel 3.7.0-rc5 and latest btrfs-progs git.
I am trying btrfs send/receive. When I have a filesystem containing a
symlink pointing to a nonexistent destination or a destination created
after the symlink was
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
instead of applying my patch, could you please just revert
commit 5986802c2fcc754040bb7ed95f30bb16c4a843b7
Author: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
Date: Mon Jul 30 02:16:10 2012 -0600
Btrfs: fix some error
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for giving quota a try. I sent a fix separately with
the subject
[PATCH] Btrfs: btrfs_qgroup_inherit wrongly returns an error
Could you please see if it fixes the problem?
Even with this patch I still
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:09 AM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Marios Titas redneb8...@gmail.com wrote:
When I create a btrfs volume of size strictly less than 256 MiB then if I do
mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
the kernel tries unsuccessfully to do the mount
When I create a btrfs volume of size strictly less than 256 MiB then if I do
mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
the kernel tries unsuccessfully to do the mount with many other file systems
before successfully trying with btrfs. For volumes of size larger than
or equal to
256 MiB it just mounts the
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
Yet another boot loader support request.
Right now btrfs' definition of RAID-1 with more than two devices is a
bit unorthodox: it stores on any two drives. True RAID-1 would
instead store N copies on each of N devices,
I tried this for many different scenarios and it seems to work pretty
well. I only ran into one problematic case: If you remove a device
from a multidevice filesystem it crashes. Here's how to reproduce it:
truncate -s1g /tmp/test1
truncate -s1g /tmp/test2
losetup /dev/loop1 /tmp/test1
losetup
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:57, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote:
Me too wants cp --reflink across subvolumes. Please make this feature
available to us, as its a poor man's dedupe and would give big space
savings for many
14 matches
Mail list logo
