@Mike Fedyk: what fsx fork exactly to use with btrfs?
And what do other btrfs developers use?
@Shuduo Sang: you find xfstests-dev over here:
http://xfs.org/index.php/Getting_the_latest_source_code#XFS_tests
Hi listIs there a btrfs testing suite the btrfs developers use to check the
codebase? I did some research and found a projectcalled xfstests-dev. It
supports ext4 as well - are there any patches to get btrfs support with
xfstests?
thanks
Hi list
I tried to copy data from btrfs raid1 to another btrfs raid1 array. To increase
the input/output blocksize from 512k to something bigger (4096k) I used
dd_rescue.
zeros.bin input file is a 1GB size clone of /dev/zero: dd_rescue -vwdDm1G
/dev/zero /mnt/xxx/zeros.bin
now the actual co
d1.
I don't have the test environment any more, so I can't offer a backtrace right
now - but I will set it up again in the next few days. If it happens again I
will contact you and send you a backtrace.
Mr. Tux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On Monday 25 January 2010 19.43:27 Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> How did you setup this array to begin with? I'm trying to reproduce this
> bug but I haven't been able to. Thanks,
>
Hi Josef,
Thanks for your help!
Linux Kernel 2.6.32.2 from kernel.org (was marked as stable at that time, I
compiled
Hi list
I tried to mount the intact device of a two memer btrfs raid array with one
device missing:
# mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /mnt
this wouldn't work with kernel 2.6.32-2 - caused some sort of memory segfault
# btrfs-vol -r missing /mnt
complained and refused to mount the array degraded wi
