On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2016-08-09 05:50, MegaBrutal wrote:
>>
>> 2016-06-03 14:43 GMT+02:00 Austin S. Hemmelgarn :
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, since you're on a new enough kernel, try 'lazytime' in the mount
>>> options as well, this defers all on-disk timestamp upd
On 2016-08-09 05:50, MegaBrutal wrote:
2016-06-03 14:43 GMT+02:00 Austin S. Hemmelgarn :
Also, since you're on a new enough kernel, try 'lazytime' in the mount options
as well, this defers all on-disk timestamp updates for up to 24 hours or until
the inode gets written out anyway, but keeps t
2016-06-03 14:43 GMT+02:00 Austin S. Hemmelgarn :
>
> Also, since you're on a new enough kernel, try 'lazytime' in the mount
> options as well, this defers all on-disk timestamp updates for up to 24 hours
> or until the inode gets written out anyway, but keeps the updated info in
> memory. The
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:27:13AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 02.06.2016 15:56, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
> >
> > In your particular situation, what's happened is that you have all the
> > space allocated to chunks, but have free space within those chunks.
> > Balance never puts data in ex
02.06.2016 15:56, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет:
>
> In your particular situation, what's happened is that you have all the
> space allocated to chunks, but have free space within those chunks.
> Balance never puts data in existing chunks, and you can't allocate any
> new chunks, so you can't run a b
On 2016-06-02 18:45, Henk Slager wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, MegaBrutal wrote:
2016-06-02 0:22 GMT+02:00 Henk Slager :
What is the kernel version used?
Is the fs on a mechanical disk or SSD?
What are the mount options?
How old is the fs?
Linux 4.4.0-22-generic (Ubuntu 16.04).
Mech
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:45:51AM +0200, Henk Slager wrote:
> The setup looks all pretty normal and btrfs should be able to handle
> it, but unfortunately your fs is a typical example that one currently
> needs to monitor/tune a btrfs fs for its 'health' in order to keep it
> running longterm.
Wh
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, MegaBrutal wrote:
> 2016-06-02 0:22 GMT+02:00 Henk Slager :
>> What is the kernel version used?
>> Is the fs on a mechanical disk or SSD?
>> What are the mount options?
>> How old is the fs?
>
> Linux 4.4.0-22-generic (Ubuntu 16.04).
> Mechanical disks in LVM.
> Mou
2016-06-02 0:22 GMT+02:00 Henk Slager :
> What is the kernel version used?
> Is the fs on a mechanical disk or SSD?
> What are the mount options?
> How old is the fs?
Linux 4.4.0-22-generic (Ubuntu 16.04).
Mechanical disks in LVM.
Mount: /dev/mapper/centrevg-rootlv on / type btrfs
(rw,relatime,spa
On 2016-06-01 14:30, MegaBrutal wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 20 GB file system and df says I have about 2,6 GB free space,
yet I can't do anything on the file system because I get "No space
left on device" errors. I read that balance may help to remedy the
situation, but it actually doesn't.
Some d
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:06 PM, MegaBrutal wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I tried. I either get "Done, had to relocate 0 out of 33 chunks" or
> "ERROR: error during balancing '/': No space left on device", and
> nothing changes.
>
>
> 2016-06-01 22:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Becker :
>> try this:
>>
>> btrfs fi
Hi Peter,
I tried. I either get "Done, had to relocate 0 out of 33 chunks" or
"ERROR: error during balancing '/': No space left on device", and
nothing changes.
2016-06-01 22:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Becker :
> try this:
>
> btrfs fi balance start -musage=0 /
> btrfs fi balance start -dusage=0 /
>
> b
try this:
btrfs fi balance start -musage=0 /
btrfs fi balance start -dusage=0 /
btrfs fi balance start -musage=1 /
btrfs fi balance start -dusage=1 /
btrfs fi balance start -musage=5 /
btrfs fi balance start -musage=10 /
btrfs fi balance start -musage=20 /
btrfs fi balance start -dusage=5 /
bt
Hi all,
I have a 20 GB file system and df says I have about 2,6 GB free space,
yet I can't do anything on the file system because I get "No space
left on device" errors. I read that balance may help to remedy the
situation, but it actually doesn't.
Some data about the FS:
root@ReThinkCentre:~#
14 matches
Mail list logo