Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use ino_t for inode in tracer

2017-06-13 Thread David Sterba
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 04:12:10PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > > > On 06/13/2017 02:41 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I thought btrfs supports 64-bit inodes, in which case this will > > truncate the inode number on 32-bit architectures. > > Good catch. Thanks ! > > Will send the updated pa

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use ino_t for inode in tracer

2017-06-13 Thread Anand Jain
On 06/13/2017 02:41 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: I thought btrfs supports 64-bit inodes, in which case this will truncate the inode number on 32-bit architectures. Good catch. Thanks ! Will send the updated patch. Thanks, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use ino_t for inode in tracer

2017-06-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I thought btrfs supports 64-bit inodes, in which case this will truncate the inode number on 32-bit architectures. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use ino_t for inode in tracer

2017-06-12 Thread David Sterba
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:10:28PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain There's one more in btrfs__qgroup_data_map, please fix it as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo

[PATCH] btrfs: use ino_t for inode in tracer

2017-06-12 Thread Anand Jain
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain --- include/trace/events/btrfs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/trace/events/btrfs.h b/include/trace/events/btrfs.h index e37973526153..6494e34b6df9 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/btrfs.h +++ b/include/trace/events/btrfs.h