Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: usage should match what is coded

2013-03-03 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:05:21PM +, Hugo Mills wrote: On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:47:50AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 3/1/13 4:10 AM, Anand Jain wrote: Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com Revieed-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com But the curious side of me

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: usage should match what is coded

2013-03-01 Thread Anand Jain
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com --- cmds-restore.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cmds-restore.c b/cmds-restore.c index 9385042..4a14f93 100644 --- a/cmds-restore.c +++ b/cmds-restore.c @@ -763,10 +763,6 @@ const char * const cmd_restore_usage[] = {

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: usage should match what is coded

2013-03-01 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 3/1/13 4:10 AM, Anand Jain wrote: Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com Revieed-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com But the curious side of me wonders how it got this way. commit e43cc461550130494194201037590a2b1f0f6880 Author: Ian Kumlien po...@demius.net Date: Fri Feb 8

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: usage should match what is coded

2013-03-01 Thread Hugo Mills
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:47:50AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 3/1/13 4:10 AM, Anand Jain wrote: Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com Revieed-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com But the curious side of me wonders how it got this way. commit