On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:50:38AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> Going back to this discussion,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:46:15PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > To be honest, how many guys really unhappy with current default features
> > behavior *except* you?
>
> Me too.
>
> Anand's summary m
David Sterba wrote on 2016/02/03 11:50 +0100:
Going back to this discussion,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:46:15PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
To be honest, how many guys really unhappy with current default features
behavior *except* you?
Me too.
Anand's summary matches my view of how we should d
Going back to this discussion,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:46:15PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> To be honest, how many guys really unhappy with current default features
> behavior *except* you?
Me too.
Anand's summary matches my view of how we should do it:
". Do it at run time for the running ker
Anand Jain wrote on 2015/11/30 12:54 +0800:
(Most of the technical reasoning were already discussed so I won't
repeat them here).
And jolting for new technical reasons finds only these..
What if the fs is not only for kernel to mount, but also a boot
partition for grub?
Do you need t
(Most of the technical reasoning were already discussed so I won't
repeat them here).
And jolting for new technical reasons finds only these..
What if the fs is not only for kernel to mount, but also a boot
partition for grub?
Do you need to check the grub2 version? Check if this is a /boo
On 11/27/2015 04:41 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
I meant, it can be done in packaging level and it's much easier to do.
Its all about trade off, and there is no right or wrong, so is tough
to arrive at a conclusion even before this was implemented. Below are
the choices considered, now pu
I meant, it can be done in packaging level and it's much easier to do.
Its all about trade off, and there is no right or wrong, so is tough
to arrive at a conclusion even before this was implemented. Below are
the choices considered, now putting in the order of least suitable
to most su
Anand Jain wrote on 2015/11/27 06:17 +0800:
Hope we are in sync on..
1.
The term auto that you are using here refs to
'Progs default-features being updated at the _run time_'.
Yes.
2.
In the long run, mostly it would be:
progs-version > LTS-kernel-version
(for the reason that user w
Hope we are in sync on..
1.
The term auto that you are using here refs to
'Progs default-features being updated at the _run time_'.
2.
In the long run, mostly it would be:
progs-version > LTS-kernel-version
(for the reason that user would need fsck,tools.. etc)
With the new -O comp= optio
On 11/26/2015 07:18 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
With the new -O comp= option, the concern on user who want to make a
btrfs for newer kernel is hugely reduced.
NO!. actually new option -O comp= provides no concern for users who
want to create _a btrfs disk layout which is compatible with more
th
With the new -O comp= option, the concern on user who want to make a
btrfs for newer kernel is hugely reduced.
NO!. actually new option -O comp= provides no concern for users who
want to create _a btrfs disk layout which is compatible with more
than one kernel_. above there are two examples
Anand Jain wrote on 2015/11/26 14:07 +0800:
On 11/26/2015 10:02 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Anand Jain wrote on 2015/11/25 20:08 +0800:
Sometimes users may want to have a btrfs to be supported on multiple
kernel version. A simple example, USB drive can be used with multiple
system running differ
On 11/26/2015 10:02 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Anand Jain wrote on 2015/11/25 20:08 +0800:
Sometimes users may want to have a btrfs to be supported on multiple
kernel version. A simple example, USB drive can be used with multiple
system running different kernel versions. Or in a data center a SAN
Anand Jain wrote on 2015/11/25 20:08 +0800:
Sometimes users may want to have a btrfs to be supported on multiple
kernel version. A simple example, USB drive can be used with multiple
system running different kernel versions. Or in a data center a SAN
LUN could be mounted on any system with diff
Sometimes users may want to have a btrfs to be supported on multiple
kernel version. A simple example, USB drive can be used with multiple
system running different kernel versions. Or in a data center a SAN
LUN could be mounted on any system with different kernel version.
Thanks for providing comm
15 matches
Mail list logo
