At 02/04/2017 07:01 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hey Qu
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:20 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Great thanks for that!
You're welcome. :)
I also added missing error message output for other places I found,
and
updated the branch, the name remains as "lowmem_tests"
Plea
Hey Qu
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:20 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Great thanks for that!
You're welcome. :)
> I also added missing error message output for other places I found,
> and
> updated the branch, the name remains as "lowmem_tests"
>
> Please try it.
# btrfs check /dev/nbd0 ; echo $?
check
At 02/03/2017 01:08 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hey Qu.
I'm sending this off-list for privacy reasons of the contained file-
names / hash sums.
It doesn't contained anything particularly secret, nevertheless, please
try to avoid spreading it too far around and delete it once you don't
At 02/02/2017 08:25 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Thanks for your test.
At 02/02/2017 06:03 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:06 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fixes
Which is also rebased to latest v4.9.1.
Same game as last
Thanks for your test.
At 02/02/2017 06:03 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:06 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fixes
Which is also rebased to latest v4.9.1.
Same game as last time, applied to 4.9, no RW mount between th
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:06 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fixes
>
> Which is also rebased to latest v4.9.1.
Same game as last time, applied to 4.9, no RW mount between the runs.
btrfs-progs v4.9 WITHOUT patch:
***
# b
At 01/30/2017 11:07 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 12:27 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, in Chinese New Year vacation.
No worries... and happy new year then ;)
Happy new year!
I'll update the patchset soon to address it.
Just tell me and I
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 12:27 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, in Chinese New Year vacation.
No worries... and happy new year then ;)
> I'll update the patchset soon to address it.
Just tell me and I re-check.
> Thanks again for your detailed output and patience,
Thanks as well
On 01/27/2017 07:31 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 11:10 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Would you please try lowmem_tests branch of my repo?
That branch contains a special debug output for the case you
encountered, which should help to debug the case.
pecial debug output f
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 11:10 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Would you please try lowmem_tests branch of my repo?
>
> That branch contains a special debug output for the case you
> encountered, which should help to debug the case.
> pecial debug output for the case you encountered, which
Here the outpu
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 11:10 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> In fact, the result without patches is not really needed for current
> stage.
>
> Feel free to skip them until the patched ones passed.
> Which should save you some time.
Well the idea is, that if I do further writes in the meantime (by
adding
Thanks for your patient and the test!
At 01/26/2017 10:50 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 12:16 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fixes
Just finished trying your new patches.
Same game as last time, applied to 4.9, no RW m
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 12:16 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fixes
Just finished trying your new patches.
Same game as last time, applied to 4.9, no RW mount between the runs.
btrfs-progs v4.9 WITHOUT patch:
***
# btrfs
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 12:16 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> New patches are out now.
>
> Although I just updated
> 0001-btrfs-progs-lowmem-check-Fix-wrong-block-group-check.patch to
> fix
> all similar bugs.
>
> You could get it from github:
> https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fix
At 01/25/2017 08:46 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 08:44 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Thanks for the test,
You're welcome... I'm happy if I can help :)
Just tell me once you think you found something, and I'll repeat the
testing.
Cheers,
Chr
is.
New patches are out
At 01/25/2017 12:54 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hey Qu.
I was giving your patches a try, again on the very same fs (which saw
however writes in the meantime), from my initial report.
btrfs-progs v4.9 WITHOUT patch:
***
# btrfs check /dev/nbd0 ; echo $?
chec
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 08:44 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Thanks for the test,
You're welcome... I'm happy if I can help :)
Just tell me once you think you found something, and I'll repeat the
testing.
Cheers,
Chr
is.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hey Qu.
I was giving your patches a try, again on the very same fs (which saw
however writes in the meantime), from my initial report.
btrfs-progs v4.9 WITHOUT patch:
***
# btrfs check /dev/nbd0 ; echo $?
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
che
Patches can be fetch from github:
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/lowmem_fixes
Although there are near 10 patches, but they are all small.
No need to be scared. :)
Thanks for reports from Chris Murphy and Christoph Anton Mitterer,
several new bugs are exposed for lowmem mode fsck.
19 matches
Mail list logo
