On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:38:23AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > As far as the conversion support stays, it's not a problem of course. I
> > don't have a complete picture of all the actual merging conflicts, but
> > the idea is to provide the callback abstraction v2 to allow ext2 and
> > reiser plus
On 11/26/2015 05:30 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:38:23AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
As far as the conversion support stays, it's not a problem of course. I
don't have a complete picture of all the actual merging conflicts, but
the idea is to provide the callback abstraction
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 06:12:57PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> But I'm a little concerned about the unstable headers, unlike ext2 its
> headers is almost stable but reiserfs seems not.
Well, reiserfs is not developped nowadays and I think Jeff implemented
the bits required for btrfs-convert. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/26/15 5:12 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2015 05:30 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:38:23AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
As far as the conversion support stays, it's not a problem of
course. I don't have a
David Sterba wrote on 2015/11/25 13:42 +0100:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:50:00PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
It seems the conflict is quite huge, your reiserfs support is based on
the old behavior, just like what old ext2 one do: custom extent allocation.
I'm afraid the rebase will take a lot
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:50:00PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> It seems the conflict is quite huge, your reiserfs support is based on
> the old behavior, just like what old ext2 one do: custom extent allocation.
> I'm afraid the rebase will take a lot of time since I'm completely a
> newbie about
David Sterba wrote on 2015/11/23 18:33 +0100:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:24:04AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Here comes the 1st version of btrfs-convert rework.
Any test is welcomed, and it can already pass the convert test from
btrfs-progs. (Since the test doesn't test rollback function)
I
David Sterba wrote on 2015/11/23 18:33 +0100:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:24:04AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Here comes the 1st version of btrfs-convert rework.
Any test is welcomed, and it can already pass the convert test from
btrfs-progs. (Since the test doesn't test rollback function)
I
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:24:04AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Here comes the 1st version of btrfs-convert rework.
> Any test is welcomed, and it can already pass the convert test from
> btrfs-progs. (Since the test doesn't test rollback function)
I went through the patches, looks mostly ok akin to
Here comes the 1st version of btrfs-convert rework.
Any test is welcomed, and it can already pass the convert test from
btrfs-progs. (Since the test doesn't test rollback function)
I also did some tests like create ext4 and fill it with fsstress to test
convert, at least no bug spotted yet.
The
10 matches
Mail list logo
