Re: [PATCH 12/12] fstest: add a fsstress+fscrypt test

On 10/11/23 04:26, Josef Bacik wrote: I noticed we don't run fsstress with fscrypt in any of our tests, and this was helpful in uncovering a couple of symlink related corner cases for the btrfs support work. Add a basic test that creates a encrypted directory and runs fsstress in that directory.

Re: [PATCH 12/12] fstest: add a fsstress+fscrypt test

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:26:05PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I noticed we don't run fsstress with fscrypt in any of our tests, and > this was helpful in uncovering a couple of symlink related corner cases > for the btrfs support work. Add a basic test that creates a encrypted > directory and run

[PATCH 12/12] fstest: add a fsstress+fscrypt test

I noticed we don't run fsstress with fscrypt in any of our tests, and this was helpful in uncovering a couple of symlink related corner cases for the btrfs support work. Add a basic test that creates a encrypted directory and runs fsstress in that directory. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- tests