On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On 07/17/2014 03:39 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
During its tree walk, btrfs_drop_snapshot() will skip any shared
subtrees it encounters. This is incorrect when we have qgroups
turned on as those subtrees need to have their contents
On 07/17/2014 03:39 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
During its tree walk, btrfs_drop_snapshot() will skip any shared
subtrees it encounters. This is incorrect when we have qgroups
turned on as those subtrees need to have their contents
accounted. In particular, the case we're concerned with is when
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:36:17PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On 08/12/2014 02:32 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On 07/17/2014 03:39 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
During its tree walk, btrfs_drop_snapshot() will skip any shared
subtrees
On 08/12/2014 03:01 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:36:17PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On 08/12/2014 02:32 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:22:31PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On 07/17/2014 03:39 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
During its tree walk,
During its tree walk, btrfs_drop_snapshot() will skip any shared
subtrees it encounters. This is incorrect when we have qgroups
turned on as those subtrees need to have their contents
accounted. In particular, the case we're concerned with is when
removing our snapshot root leaves the subtree with
