On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:16:41PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:16:12PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
I've noticed that return value from merge_reloc_roots is never checked
in the callers. Did you verify that this is ok?
Yeah, it's fine.
Then it's ok to change return value
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:16:12PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:25:37AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we
also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree
and reloc roots list.
Here we use a helper
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:25:37AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we
also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree
and reloc roots list.
Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and
since this function
We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we
also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree
and reloc roots list.
Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and
since this function can also be used in the balance recover path,
we also make
