Re: [PATCH 2/6] Btrfs: use more straightforward extent_buffer_uptodate

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 15.05.2018 20:52, Liu Bo wrote: >> In read_block_for_search(), it's straightforward to use >> extent_buffer_uptodate() instead since 0 is passed as parent transid to > > "instead of the more heavyweight

Re: [PATCH 2/6] Btrfs: use more straightforward extent_buffer_uptodate

On 15.05.2018 20:52, Liu Bo wrote: > In read_block_for_search(), it's straightforward to use > extent_buffer_uptodate() instead since 0 is passed as parent transid to "instead of the more heavyweight btrfs_buffer_update" > btrfs_buffer_uptodate(), which means the check for parent transid is

[PATCH 2/6] Btrfs: use more straightforward extent_buffer_uptodate

In read_block_for_search(), it's straightforward to use extent_buffer_uptodate() instead since 0 is passed as parent transid to btrfs_buffer_uptodate(), which means the check for parent transid is not needed. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 +- 1 file