On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 21.11.18 г. 20:59 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> > From: Josef Bacik
> >
> > The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it
> > needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to
> >
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:59:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
>
> The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it
> needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to
> run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to
>
On 21.11.18 г. 20:59 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
>
> The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it
> needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to
> run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:59:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>From: Josef Bacik
>
>The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it
>needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to
>run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to
From: Josef Bacik
The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it
needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to
run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to
cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to
