On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:51:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks fine, but can't we also remove the workaround at the end of the
> the test as well?
Oh, heh, yes, those can go. The whitespace is wrong on them anyway.
--D
>
> ___
> xfs
Looks fine, but can't we also remove the workaround at the end of the
the test as well?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
If we're running against a old version of xfsprogs that lacks some of
the structures that the golden output knows about, copy the structure
size definition from the golden output to the program output. This
way we can check for structure size mutations on old xfsprogs without
generating false
