On 11/13/2018 11:21 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
(Thanks for the comments on requiring to warn_on if we fail the device change.)
(This fixes an ugly bug, I appreciate if you have any further comments).
Its not that impossible to imagine
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> (Thanks for the comments on requiring to warn_on if we fail the device
> change.)
> (This fixes an ugly bug, I appreciate if you have any further comments).
>
> Its not that impossible to imagine that a device OR a btrfs image is
>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> (Thanks for the comments on requiring to warn_on if we fail the device
> change.)
> (This fixes an ugly bug, I appreciate if you have any further comments).
>
> Its not that impossible to imagine that a device OR a btrfs image is
>
(Thanks for the comments on requiring to warn_on if we fail the device change.)
(This fixes an ugly bug, I appreciate if you have any further comments).
Its not that impossible to imagine that a device OR a btrfs image is
been copied just by using the dd or the cp command. Which in case both
the
