Hi Miao,
With the V3 patch applied, I was able to run dbench 50 without a problem.
Thanks,
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:15:44 +0800
Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:02:55 +0900, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
I have applied the V2 patch on top of the next-rc branch of
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Chris Mason
This work is really cool, thanks for doing it. I'm starting a run on
this tonight and if all goes well I'll review in detail and try to queue
it along with the per-subvolume storage bits for .39.
Thanks!
-chris
This is the kind of thing --
Hi, Kitayama-san
Sorry for my late reply.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:02:55 +0900, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
I have applied the V2 patch on top of the next-rc branch of btrfs-unstable
and ran dbench 50. The run never finished and lots of stall messages recorded
in the log.
Looking at the stack trace,
Hi, Chris
CC Tsutomu Itoh
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:09:00 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2011-02-17 00:48:40 -0500:
Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree
Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2011-02-18 08:09:28 -0500:
On fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:19:42 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2011-02-18 04:08:12 -0500:
Hi, Chris
CC Tsutomu Itoh
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:09:00 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Miao
Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2011-02-17 00:48:40 -0500:
Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions,
such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on.
If
