On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:37:47PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:55:04PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:12:56PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> >> As Qu mentioned in this thread
> >> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64469.html), compression
>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:55:04PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:12:56PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
>> As Qu mentioned in this thread
>> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64469.html), compression
>> can cause regular extent to co-exist with inlined extent. This coe
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:12:56PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> As Qu mentioned in this thread
> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64469.html), compression
> can cause regular extent to co-exist with inlined extent. This coexistence
> makes things confusing. Since it was permitted currentl
As Qu mentioned in this thread
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64469.html), compression
can cause regular extent to co-exist with inlined extent. This coexistence
makes things confusing. Since it was permitted currently, so fix
btrfsck to prevent a bunch of error logs that will make u
