On 2018-05-18 04:06, Anand Jain wrote:
Thanks Austin and Jeff for the suggestion.
I am not particularly a fan of mount option either mainly because
those options aren't persistent and host independent luns will
have tough time to have them synchronize manually.
Properties are better as it is
Thanks Austin and Jeff for the suggestion.
I am not particularly a fan of mount option either mainly because
those options aren't persistent and host independent luns will
have tough time to have them synchronize manually.
Properties are better as it is persistent. And we can apply this
On 2018-05-17 10:46, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 5/16/18 6:35 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:03:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
-o no_read_mirror_policy instead of -o read_mirror_policy=-
Mount option is mostly likely not
On 5/17/18 8:25 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2018-05-16 22:32, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/17/2018 06:35 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:03:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
-o no_read_mirror_policy
On 5/16/18 6:35 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:03:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
>> -o no_read_mirror_policy instead of -o read_mirror_policy=-
>
> Mount option is mostly likely not the right interface for setting
On 2018-05-16 22:32, Anand Jain wrote:
On 05/17/2018 06:35 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:03:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
-o no_read_mirror_policy instead of -o read_mirror_policy=-
Mount option is mostly likely
On 05/17/2018 06:35 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:03:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
-o no_read_mirror_policy instead of -o read_mirror_policy=-
Mount option is mostly likely not the right interface for setting
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:03:56PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
> -o no_read_mirror_policy instead of -o read_mirror_policy=-
Mount option is mostly likely not the right interface for setting such
options, as usual.
--
To unsubscribe from
Not yet ready for the integration. As I need to introduce
-o no_read_mirror_policy instead of -o read_mirror_policy=-
to reset the policy as in 3/3. But I am sending this early so that
we can use it for btrfs/161 in the ML, and this patch-set is stable
enough for the testing.
Anand Jain (3):