On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:21:13AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Also, it should provide a quite good base for rework inode cache for
> future development.
You mean what's now under 'inode_cache' mount option? It builds on the
free space cache infrastructure so it would be natural to use it as
well.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:58:13AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Omar Sandoval wrote on 2015/09/10 20:48 -0700:
> >On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:21:13AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>Hi Omar,
> >>
> >>Thanks for your patchset.
> >>Quite a nice one, and debug-tree can give better output on space cache.
Omar Sandoval wrote on 2015/09/10 20:48 -0700:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:21:13AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Hi Omar,
Thanks for your patchset.
Quite a nice one, and debug-tree can give better output on space cache.
With current implement, space cache is near a black box in debug-tree
output.
A
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:21:13AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> Thanks for your patchset.
> Quite a nice one, and debug-tree can give better output on space cache.
> With current implement, space cache is near a black box in debug-tree
> output.
>
> And current on disk format is not qui
Hi Omar,
Thanks for your patchset.
Quite a nice one, and debug-tree can give better output on space cache.
With current implement, space cache is near a black box in debug-tree
output.
And current on disk format is not quite easy to understand.(In fact,
space cache is restored in tree root, a
tember 04, 2015 3:44 AM
> > To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Omar Sandoval
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] free space B-tree
> >
> > Here's version 2 of the the free space B-tree patches, addressing Josef's
> > review
> > from the last
fs@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Omar Sandoval
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] free space B-tree
>
> Here's version 2 of the the free space B-tree patches, addressing Josef's
> review
> from the last round, which you can find here:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46713
Here's version 2 of the the free space B-tree patches, addressing
Josef's review from the last round, which you can find here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46713.html
Changes from v1->v2:
- Cleaned up a bunch of unnecessary instances of "if (ret) goto out; ret = 0"
- Added aborts i
