On 2018年04月17日 01:27, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:53:10PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
>> On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
re
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:53:10PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
> >> remaining patches.
> >>
> >> However without this
On 2018/04/12 22:13, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
>> remaining patches.
>>
>> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
>> obviously increased as prea
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
> remaining patches.
>
> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed
> unt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:03:15PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >
> > On 2018年04月04日 16:53, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > On 3.04.2018 10:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > >> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
> > >> remaining patches.
> > >>
> > >> However without this p
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 08:17:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年04月04日 16:53, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3.04.2018 10:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
> >> remaining patches.
> >>
> >> However
On 2018年04月04日 16:53, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 3.04.2018 10:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
>> remaining patches.
>>
>> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
>> obviously increased as
On 3.04.2018 10:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
> remaining patches.
>
> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed
> until i
Hi David,
I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the
remaining patches.
However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get
obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed
until inode reserved space is freed.
This would cause a lot of
On 2/22/18 6:34 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月23日 06:44, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> On 12/22/17 1:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
>>> doesn't really need to care things like csum size or extent usage for
>>> whole tree COW.
>>>
[snip]
>>
>> We don't need to do such check at call site.
>>
>> Just do the calculation (which should be really simple, as simple as
>> nodesize * nr_items_to_add), and pass it to btrfs_qgroup_reserve_* APIs,
>> which would handle the quota enabled check.
>>
>>>
>>> be contained into the block rsv
On 23.02.2018 11:06, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月23日 16:14, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23.02.2018 01:34, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018年02月23日 06:44, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 12/22/17 1:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for met
On 2018年02月23日 16:14, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 23.02.2018 01:34, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年02月23日 06:44, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>>> On 12/22/17 1:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
doesn't really need to care thing
On 23.02.2018 01:34, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年02月23日 06:44, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> On 12/22/17 1:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
>>> doesn't really need to care things like csum size or extent usage for
>>> whole tree COW.
On 2018年02月23日 06:44, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 12/22/17 1:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
>> doesn't really need to care things like csum size or extent usage for
>> whole tree COW.
>>
>> Qgroup care more about net change of extent
On 12/22/17 1:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
> doesn't really need to care things like csum size or extent usage for
> whole tree COW.
>
> Qgroup care more about net change of extent usage.
> That's to say, if we're going to insert o
Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
doesn't really need to care things like csum size or extent usage for
whole tree COW.
Qgroup care more about net change of extent usage.
That's to say, if we're going to insert one file extent, it will mostly
find its place in C
17 matches
Mail list logo