On 28.05.2018 17:21, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:27:50PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年05月18日 11:00, Liu Bo wrote:
>>> The check is superfluous since all of callers who set search_for_commit
>>> also have skip_locking set.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
>>
>> Revie
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:27:50PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年05月18日 11:00, Liu Bo wrote:
> > The check is superfluous since all of callers who set search_for_commit
> > also have skip_locking set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
>
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
>
> Although more obvious
On 2018年05月18日 11:00, Liu Bo wrote:
> The check is superfluous since all of callers who set search_for_commit
> also have skip_locking set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Although more obvious comment about search_commit_root and skip_locking
in ctree.h will be much better.
The check is superfluous since all of callers who set search_for_commit
also have skip_locking set.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index d12fc0474e21..8d3b09038f37 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+