On 2018年05月18日 11:00, Liu Bo wrote:
> The check is superfluous since all of callers who set search_for_commit
> also have skip_locking set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>

Although more obvious comment about search_commit_root and skip_locking
in ctree.h will be much better.

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index d12fc0474e21..8d3b09038f37 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -2623,8 +2623,6 @@ static struct extent_buffer 
> *btrfs_search_slot_get_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
>               level = btrfs_header_level(b);
>               if (p->need_commit_sem)
>                       up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
> -             if (!p->skip_locking)
> -                     btrfs_tree_read_lock(b);
>  
>               goto out;
>       }
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to