On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Dan Garton wrote:
>
> Assuming that this is the case, do I stand a chance of retrieving that
> volume and accessing that data again?
> Or does "destructive" imply total loss? (In which case, I'll cut my
> losses)
unfortunately i really don't know enough to advi
Hi, thanks for the reply.
Yes, I agree, after going back over the commands, those ones you
highlighted seem very suspicious
These commands were executed weeks ago amid a fair amount of confusion.
But yes, I think that you are right - from memory the FS became
inaccessible at about the time yo
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Dan Garton wrote:
>
> [...]
> 1327 btrfs-vol -a
> 1328 btrfs-vol -a /nuvat
> 1329 btrfs-vol -a asdasd /nuvat
> 1330 btrfs-vol -a missing /nuvat
> 1331 btrfs-vol -a /dev/sdc /nuvat
> 1332 btrfs-vol -a /dev/sdb /nuvat
> 1334 btrfs-vol -a missing /nuvat
Hi,
I'm running Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.38 on a fileserver system.
One of the disks in a RAID1 configuration failed (/dev/sdc), and since then
I haven't been able to access the btrfs filesystem on the remaining disk
(/dev/sdb).
root@midnite:~/src/btrfs-progs-unstable# ./btrfsck /dev/sdb
No valid
