Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
> The question is, why is this important? It probably isn't, its just my overactive sense of neatness ;-) But, jokes aside, I am going to use the filesystem as it is now and then when openSUSE 13.2 arrives I will give it another try with a new kernel and new filesystem tools. Thank you for y

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi Stefan, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. >>> They'll go away if you balance them: >>> >>> btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single >>> /mountpoint >> >> btrfs r

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Hugo Mills
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:57:02PM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote: > > > > So try this one: > > btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v > > I fear that didn't work too. > > mars:/mnt # btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v btrfs/ > Dumping filters: flags 0x6, state 0x0, force is off > METADATA (fl

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-28 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
> So try this one: > btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v I fear that didn't work too. mars:/mnt # btrfs balance start -musage=0 -v btrfs/ Dumping filters: flags 0x6, state 0x0, force is off METADATA (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=0 SYSTEM (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=0 Done, had to relocate

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-27 Thread Duncan
Stefan Malte Schumacher posted on Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:37:26 +0200 as excerpted: > Chris and Duncan: I tried both your suggestions but unfortunately > without success. Here is the output: > > mars:~ # btrfs balance start -susage=0 -f -v /mnt/btrfs/ > Dumping filters: flags 0xa, state 0x0, force is

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-27 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
Hello Chris and Duncan: I tried both your suggestions but unfortunately without success. Here is the output: mars:~ # btrfs balance start -susage=0 -f -v /mnt/btrfs/ Dumping filters: flags 0xa, state 0x0, force is on SYSTEM (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=0 Done, had to relocate 0 out of 2708 c

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Duncan
Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 26 Apr 2014 15:28:03 -0600 as excerpted: >>> btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single >>> -sprofiles=single /mountpoint > >> After that btrfs fi df shows the following: >> >> Data, RAID1: total=2.64TiB, used=2.22TiB >> System, RAID1: total=8.00MiB, us

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Chris Murphy
On Apr 26, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote: >> >> They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. >> They'll go away if you balance them: >> >> btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single >> /mountpoint > > btrfs refused

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
> >They're harmless -- it's a side-effect of the way that mkfs works. > They'll go away if you balance them: > >btrfs balance start -dprofiles=single -mprofiles=single -sprofiles=single > /mountpoint btrfs refused this command, I had to pass --force to execute it. It exited with this:Do

Re: Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Hugo Mills
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote: > Hello > > Yesterday I created a btrfs-filesystem on two disk, using raid1 for > data and metadata. I then mounted it and rsynced several TB of data > onto it. > > mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sdf /dev/sdg > > The com

Confusing output of btrfs fi df

2014-04-26 Thread Stefan Malte Schumacher
Hello Yesterday I created a btrfs-filesystem on two disk, using raid1 for data and metadata. I then mounted it and rsynced several TB of data onto it. mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sdf /dev/sdg The command btrfs fi df /mnt/btrfs result in the following output: Data, RAID1: total=2.64TiB, us