Hi,
I've noticed some time ago that our device replace implementation is
unreliable. Basically under several situations it ends up not copying
extents (both data and metadata) from the old device to the new device
(I briefly talked about some of the problems with Josef at LSF).
Essentially it ope
Filipe Manana wrote on 2016/05/11 10:09 +0100:
Hi,
I've noticed some time ago that our device replace implementation is
unreliable. Basically under several situations it ends up not copying
extents (both data and metadata) from the old device to the new device
(I briefly talked about some of t
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Filipe Manana wrote on 2016/05/11 10:09 +0100:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed some time ago that our device replace implementation is
>> unreliable. Basically under several situations it ends up not copying
>> extents (both data and metadata)
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed some time ago that our device replace implementation is
> unreliable. Basically under several situations it ends up not copying
> extents (both data and metadata) from the old device to the new device
> (I briefly talked
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Filipe Manana wrote:
I've noticed some time ago that our device replace implementation is
unreliable. Basically under several situations it ends up not copying
extents (both data and metadata) from the old device to the new device
(I briefly talked about some of the problems
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Filipe Manana wrote:
>
>>> I've noticed some time ago that our device replace implementation is
>>> unreliable. Basically under several situations it ends up not copying
>>> extents (both data and metadata) from the old d
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:43:47AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > Hi Filipe,
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> >
> > Does your recent patch set (from May 20) address all of these issues?
>
> Yes.
Tested, RAID5/6 still produces a plenty of 'failed to rebuild valid
logical NN" messages after two consecutive
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Yauhen Kharuzhy
wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:43:47AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
>> > Hi Filipe,
>>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> >
>> > Does your recent patch set (from May 20) address all of these issues?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Tested, RAID5/6 still produces a plenty of 'fai
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Yauhen Kharuzhy
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:43:47AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
Hi Filipe,
Hi Scott,
Does your recent patch set (from May 20) address all of these issues?
Yes.
Tested, RAID5/6 still prod